[lp-wan] RuleID size in SCHC compression over 802.15.4
Carles Gomez Montenegro <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> Fri, 14 January 2022 13:25 UTC
Return-Path: <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDA93A24A4;
Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:25:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8lVmgcnS9x2F; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:25:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dash.upc.es (dash.upc.es [147.83.2.50])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E23D13A24A3;
Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from entelserver.upc.edu (entelserver.upc.es [147.83.40.4])
by dash.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id 20EDPZqs065051;
Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:25:35 +0100
Received: from webmail.entel.upc.edu (webmail.entel.upc.edu [147.83.40.6])
by entelserver.upc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D00E1D53C1;
Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:25:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 2.138.70.102 by webmail.entel.upc.edu with HTTP;
Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:26:33 +0100
Message-ID: <024e5adb35110d2bc1e0152e0af1d9bc.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:26:33 +0100
From: "Carles Gomez Montenegro" <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
To: dominique.barthel@orange.com
Cc: 6lo@ietf.org, lp-wan@ietf.org, ana@ackl.io
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21-1.fc14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at dash
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:42:42 by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (dash.upc.es
[147.83.2.50]); Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:25:35 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/588XXOJcLhsCdu9LmZyHUmdeF2w>
Subject: [lp-wan] RuleID size in SCHC compression over 802.15.4
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\),
also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>,
<mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>,
<mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:25:43 -0000
Hi Dominique, (CC'ing both 6Lo and LPWAN.) In the 6Lo session of IETF 112 you made some comments on draft-gomez-6lo-schc-15dot4-01 (thanks!). One of them was a question regarding the RuleID size, since in -01 we had (still have) the following statement: "The present specification defines a RuleID size of 8 bits." Based on your question (why specify a fixed size RuleID?), we are now considering use of a variable size RuleID, to be added in -02. In particular, we (the authors) are considering allowing a RuleID size between 1 bit and 8 bits. On the other hand, we are discussing whether it might make sense to allow a RuleID size greater than 8 bits as well. In this regard, did have any scenario in mind that would benefit from a RuleID size greater than 8 bits? Thanks, Carles and Ana
- [lp-wan] RuleID size in SCHC compression over 802… Carles Gomez Montenegro