IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lp-wan] SCHC RFC-to-be title?

Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io> Fri, 07 February 2020 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ivaylo@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50F51200B4 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 23:58:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1HsMvjRQLL-y for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 23:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1102C12003E for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 23:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id k11so1466608wrd.9 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 23:58:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wu8RSSmpIventmW/lnD6RLa5rVDQaXQu76yYP+aHNxs=; b=nb98RfOOhCtPbNV7MyzLIAgI7pVK5jY5DrxHCTkc7po9EiGQDxRkYCXzD+N0jLlnuN 6xgYu4GjzPiNjnYK3zEaLG5WSFDzIwbzcSmjq58IZGEa/05bYiIrjcmHUuqBZ1cc2e6L Om38t16dWewrOMifIVthl2gyr/T3a58W8B+UxLsSpEdX+e5VR0fE+pR2nHnUdoXUPMz8 aTozTF0kR2ei4VW5e5krl4oaveFTq2dC6KMNv3KqTCHkApXoFpn0miIyi3/4CTpIXWtV 5AsB0FDko0tMpCbTlsSYhCHtb/PlQ5nzc7zFIBsZ9VwgFx/FbGYQPrdnttGeP0pR3fSc QiQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wu8RSSmpIventmW/lnD6RLa5rVDQaXQu76yYP+aHNxs=; b=MxNvKS10e3dmxd+OAMq1op+83Bz0aA+0eYR1KZSe12+UdWBzZnYhDgFyEVN0KDJjn9 s550ZE5AQK8HbB+pPuNOeyzjVozYQzZNup1qfYbmLUOdHsvX9TGHw0U3pJpqUFrUpGk9 +RcH1eIKZTZmp0ih8Kwqw2HVbbqs9LX8t5lmPriNwCY9lCFlAN771DH1sxz6DHwi9Y29 hEL3oMKjRqI8lk6DNkkKDIbYhVoGIHjfrQMSh+9Q9Q92pQnrJYvl6ovaVBM/SnYqkeHA EXNzusAaHrSESXybhtzYKUf8QT+1U0Xl1fbecu+ZVDlKY0T6UFwksOuCFR+Y9OK28hw6 47Nw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVMRiqSo0MATq8PJbodXzIOjvkD5g1Uyv7NRq+rbav6pVTtVBN7 1JzKtiIyjaBNRBM7IRP/9Z0q0Hl85mwTOC4pujfaEQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwhdJLtsNdLeK5ii7Ke5J5L3smko60Lnks7cph25+bzlmfz1fdwjEF+eJ5E3isoviq3jaLelB7cVM6qNplhN9w=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e746:: with SMTP id c6mr2981211wrn.323.1581062312603; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 23:58:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <12947_1580993474_5E3C0BC2_12947_94_1_DA61CA03.6FF7C%dominique.barthel@orange.com> <CACQW0EqYNhD-WC5pwn6b51HCMU=y3RKr9zz4cC9XK4t112mpaw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH7SZV9gvhF6a84Rq6BzS3NhLuvgVS1jMdsjmr+QQD2Kzg-jLQ@mail.gmail.com> <2a6a86dad23b42a49ef050344bbc4af3@semtech.com> <fc024f07-12c0-d457-ad99-a5d47be04152@kerlink.fr>
In-Reply-To: <fc024f07-12c0-d457-ad99-a5d47be04152@kerlink.fr>
From: Ivaylo Petrov <ivaylo@ackl.io>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 08:58:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJFkdRw6+s44Us5-4tpwtaH7EXhSTjwaUkaOrcdUrAWh9hdWCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julien CATALANO <j.catalano@kerlink.fr>
Cc: Olivier Gimenez <ogimenez@semtech.com>, "lp-wan@ietf.org" <lp-wan@ietf.org>, BARTHEL Dominique IMT/OLPS <dominique.barthel@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000082c327059df7c147"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/5vGvC2NF2kBCka2Ydj1F5RKSTac>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] SCHC RFC-to-be title?
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:58:37 -0000

Dear all,

My vote goes for A1 and B1* as stated by Olivier.

Cheers,
Ivaylo


On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 5:36 PM Julien CATALANO <j.catalano@kerlink.fr>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> My votes goes for A.1 B.1* as stated by Olivier: "SCHC: generic
> framework for fragmentation and header compression using a static context".
>
> Cheers
> Julien
>
> Le 06/02/2020 à 15:24, Olivier Gimenez a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I vote for A3 B1.
> >
> > Even if B1 might be easier to read as “SCHC: generic framework for
> > fragmentation and header compression using a static context” because
> > the is no ambiguity that fragmentation applies to all packet and not
> > only the header
> >
> >
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> >
> > To view our privacy policy, including the types of personal
> > information we collect, process and share, and the rights and options
> > you have in this respect, see www.semtech.com/legal.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lp-wan mailing list
> > lp-wan@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
>
> _______________________________________________
> lp-wan mailing list
> lp-wan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email