Re: [lp-wan] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-13: (with COMMENT)

[Barry Leiba <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Olivier!

Barry

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:10 AM Olivier Gimenez <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hello Barry,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your review. Even if LoRa is the short of LOng RAnge, LoRaWAN is a registered trademark and I have been asked not to expand it as it is not supposed to be expanded.
>
> Nevertheless I updated the introduction to reference the LoRaWAN specification, and added a LoRaWAN entry in the terminology section
>
>
>
> Please see this commit for the changes.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Olivier
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
>
> > Sent: 05 November 2020 04:52
>
> > To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
>
> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; lp-
>
> > [e-mail]; Dominique Barthel <[e-mail]>;
>
> > [e-mail]
>
> > Subject: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-13:
>
> > (with COMMENT)
>
> >
>
> > Warning - External Email
>
> > ________________________________
>
> >
>
> > Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
>
> > draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan-13: No Objection
>
> >
>
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
>
> > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
>
> > paragraph, however.)
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-lorawan/
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > COMMENT:
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
>
> > The title, Abstract, and Introduction all use “LoRaWAN” without expansion or
>
> > explanation.  I suggest expanding it as “Long Range WAN” in all three places,
>
> > and citing [lora-alliance-spec] at that expansion in the Introduction (you dont
>
> > cite it until Section 4).
>
> >
>
> > Please expand LPWAN on first use in the Introduction.
>
> >
>
> > And a comment about Martin’s comment: “I found this document to be very
>
> > tough going without reading through RFC8724.” ... Well, to be fair, 8724 is a
>
> > normative reference, so isn’t that sort of expected?
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
> To view our privacy policy, including the types of personal information we collect, process and share, and the rights and options you have in this respect, see www.semtech.com/legal.