[lp-wan] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc-21: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 22 August 2019 01:03 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CA212010E; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc@ietf.org, Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>, Dominique Barthel <dominique.barthel@orange.com>, lpwan-chairs@ietf.org, pthubert@cisco.com, lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <156643579552.25773.13769866708821790148.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:03:15 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/ERzV0LXdIB0Uz7l-IPgz9WIK6EM>
Subject: [lp-wan] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 01:03:16 -0000

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc-21: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Please respond to the Gen-ART review.

It seems as though RFC 8376 should be a normative reference given its use in
the terminology section.