Re: [lp-wan] RFC 8724 on SCHC: Generic Framework for Static Context Header Compression and Fragmentation
Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io> Thu, 16 April 2020 07:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ana@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EF63A1132 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 00:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id plVj9HD7yJrc for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 00:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C16863A112F for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 00:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id u5so6043504ilb.5 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 00:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=deAZ9sCUUekSj6pKQ4zNjT4tLEpKi6TZNi1QXR1Xk8o=; b=qUTzaO9K52Di9IBNU83I+Qj68vBPQWHCiLW+vQbFBvNtWlD2HRpIr8F3umTV79z9NC zjHS9nPE2/Rfp8KFxV8AvD/KHe7A8VnyApE7db30Iu/xTLojRkmv5vzwlkKswMWxetoL x2cjDH08klevQEiv2iGKdiOq9JjJOEHfXJiIT3Li6pjgEDef44WkDl+KpUeSQgWYD9nw jFIuy7DBeMMb1/DdgaklklLDSyKi6GPxgT0h6WvcXSdmlJtO4F1MMW0mpwmrAGFjZBIO Z5YdHIAdXxyROFlCefLPlLrqknjVd0MBNi5L2oHk60rAEF88OEn3oz5XVO9/shR8D5Hx 2lYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=deAZ9sCUUekSj6pKQ4zNjT4tLEpKi6TZNi1QXR1Xk8o=; b=GCFdQvZU81VENrsw8UFgKFJaiNQfJp9zxu8noJJOedEf9JzHX/kBdFEf0Sk8dSOnoZ jTU6ePO0q1AbXhsVuImqpAAZ4ZXkpfHrxpud8HqS3TWew07c5//uoy3XNbPKvDfCx/TJ 1P7R7qCQbQ7FdtjQkpFX/cnDxwwOcUkQKUhzUsFGemL7yWeQOR1dyKg8AS01tpE5k/HL VVbqJkUpOchcr0yjdN0RwZNKi94PKUGriQb1G3vxGtcIKJM881ZksDNAyUL/6x2aa11a EVa95B1DRdpNr6vvMxFXJuQas0ttmeDUur4IeSqcMAwk3YCwgsIdBRQBEjm2+CkhdZKK vYPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pubnfx2BOm3wlrKp3eiShb5RZKs9FE8qLu2QxViUdf6CjrSSteOf 56XUMEe0ITwCFwCe+wMf//BnpQ8GuDlmUEZ02YPHPw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLQpGypb9PJ6vMw/Ug/TLXFejn8h3Xs6NLW+JceXm4s1JMni9xl/m4YRHydlrvNu7Fv3o2N1T829ZNd59dtZnY=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:8fc4:: with SMTP id r65mr9008524ilk.179.1587023766346; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 00:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200416023941.58346F4074C@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200416023941.58346F4074C@rfc-editor.org>
From: Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:55:40 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAbr+nSJ+LAp8Zeq2MF5azB8C_QXEKHs_eD8b=CBrrFBEkuyGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org, lp-wan <lp-wan@ietf.org>, drafts-update-ref@iana.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d7f25605a363c350"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/FFhMl49QW-VulIwlA8rBna6N8_U>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] RFC 8724 on SCHC: Generic Framework for Static Context Header Compression and Fragmentation
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 07:56:10 -0000
Congrats!!! Youpi!! Today or Friday is ok! Ana On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 4:40 AM <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 8724 > > Title: SCHC: Generic Framework for Static > Context Header Compression and Fragmentation > Author: A. Minaburo, > L. Toutain, > C. Gomez, > D. Barthel, > JC. Zúñiga > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: April 2020 > Mailbox: ana@ackl.io, > laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr, > carlesgo@entel.upc.edu, > dominique.barthel@orange.com, > juancarlos.zuniga@sigfox.com > Pages: 71 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc-24.txt > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8724 > > DOI: 10.17487/RFC8724 > > This document defines the Static Context Header Compression and > fragmentation (SCHC) framework, which provides both a header > compression mechanism and an optional fragmentation mechanism. SCHC > has been designed with Low-Power Wide Area Networks (LPWANs) in mind. > > SCHC compression is based on a common static context stored both in > the LPWAN device and in the network infrastructure side. This > document defines a generic header compression mechanism and its > application to compress IPv6/UDP headers. > > This document also specifies an optional fragmentation and reassembly > mechanism. It can be used to support the IPv6 MTU requirement over > the LPWAN technologies. Fragmentation is needed for IPv6 datagrams > that, after SCHC compression or when such compression was not > possible, still exceed the Layer 2 maximum payload size. > > The SCHC header compression and fragmentation mechanisms are > independent of the specific LPWAN technology over which they are > used. This document defines generic functionalities and offers > flexibility with regard to parameter settings and mechanism choices. > This document standardizes the exchange over the LPWAN between two > SCHC entities. Settings and choices specific to a technology or a > product are expected to be grouped into profiles, which are specified > in other documents. Data models for the context and profiles are out > of scope. > > This document is a product of the IPv6 over Low Power Wide-Area Networks > Working Group of the IETF. > > This is now a Proposed Standard. > > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and > suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for > the > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this > memo is unlimited. > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. > > > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC > > > _______________________________________________ > lp-wan mailing list > lp-wan@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan >
- [lp-wan] RFC 8724 on SCHC: Generic Framework for … rfc-editor
- Re: [lp-wan] RFC 8724 on SCHC: Generic Framework … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [lp-wan] RFC 8724 on SCHC: Generic Framework … Ana Minaburo
- Re: [lp-wan] RFC 8724 on SCHC: Generic Framework … Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [lp-wan] RFC 8724 on SCHC: Generic Framework … Alexander Pelov
- Re: [lp-wan] RFC 8724 on SCHC: Generic Framework … Georgios Z. Papadopoulos