Re: [lp-wan] [Secdispatch] [core] EDHOC Summary

[ana minaburo <[e-mail]>]

+1

Ana

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:50 PM Laurent Toutain <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I support also the creation of this WG. EDHOC is very promising for  LPWAN
> networks.
>
> Laurent
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:37 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Unsurprisingly I'm on the same page;
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Pascal
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: core <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
>> > Sent: mardi 2 avril 2019 11:19
>> > To: Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]>; Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>
>> > Cc: [e-mail]; core <[e-mail]>
>> > Subject: Re: [core] [Secdispatch] EDHOC Summary
>> >
>> > FWIW, I had not had time to look at this during the IETF week, nor did
>> I have
>> > an opportunity to be at the CORE WG during the IETF. But I support
>> Roman's
>> > conclusion below:
>> >
>> > >> -----[ Conclusion
>> > >>
>> > >> There appears to be an understood and scoped problem that is
>> feasible to
>> > engineer.  Among the available starting points to address the problem
>> defined
>> > in question #1, EDHOC presents a viable choice.
>> > >>
>> > >> Chartering a narrowly scoped, short-lived WG in this space with
>> EDHOC as a
>> > starting point seems to be an attractive path forward, but we would
>> like to
>> > receive community feedback on the degree of support for this approach.
>> >
>> > Jari
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > core mailing list
>> > [e-mail]
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Secdispatch mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch
>>
> _______________________________________________
> lp-wan mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
>