Re: [lp-wan] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8824 (7395)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Tue, 02 May 2023 22:45 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E256C1519B3 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2023 15:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9DbX5bTj-RbN for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 May 2023 15:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D203CC151539 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 May 2023 15:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31EE424B444; Tue, 2 May 2023 15:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8vvDnoZnGb6R; Tue, 2 May 2023 15:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75AC3424B443; Tue, 2 May 2023 15:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.500.231\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230319102615.D71CD56694@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 15:43:55 -0700
Cc: marco.tiloca@ri.se, ana@ackl.io, laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr, randreasen@fi.uba.ar, lp-wan@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C8A128F3-00B3-4BB9-994A-C34962E055C3@amsl.com>
References: <20230319102615.D71CD56694@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.500.231)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/RIGrjeRLfOKIkc_tiusgYvRePrM>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8824 (7395)
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 22:45:10 -0000

Hi Eric,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. 
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7395

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs

> On Mar 19, 2023, at 3:26 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8824,
> "Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7395
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Marco Tiloca <marco.tiloca@ri.se>
> 
> Section: 7.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> SCHC compression reduces the header, sending only the Type, a mapped
> code, and the least significant bits of the Message ID (9 bits in the
> example above).
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> SCHC compression reduces the header, sending only a mapped Type (and
> only for uplink messages), a mapped code, and the least significant
> bits of the Message ID (9 bits in the example above).
> 
> Notes
> -----
> As per the discussed rule from Table 3, the Type is also omitted if it is CON for downlink messages.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8824 (draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
> Publication Date    : June 2021
> Author(s)           : A. Minaburo, L. Toutain, R. Andreasen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IPv6 over Low Power Wide-Area Networks
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>