[lp-wan] [lpwan] doubts and correction about schc_streaming draft
Rodrigo Muñoz Lara <rmunozlara@ing.uchile.cl> Tue, 02 May 2023 18:36 UTC
Return-Path: <rmunozlara@ing.uchile.cl>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4804C151530; Tue, 2 May 2023 11:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ing.uchile.cl header.b="jJTn3IDr"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ing.uchile.cl header.b="jJTn3IDr"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6hB1VrpzAlx; Tue, 2 May 2023 11:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cec.uchile.cl (mail1.cec.uchile.cl [200.9.97.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00B0C1516EB; Tue, 2 May 2023 11:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cec.uchile.cl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cec.uchile.cl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EA2A099A; Tue, 2 May 2023 14:35:51 -0400 (-04)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.cec.uchile.cl C5EA2A099A
Authentication-Results: mail1.cec.uchile.cl; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ing.uchile.cl
Authentication-Results: mail1.cec.uchile.cl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ing.uchile.cl
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.cec.uchile.cl C5EA2A099A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ing.uchile.cl; s=default; t=1683052551; bh=ePXh/BB92pUinNT9Kt8KSlYgLlEX0m/KwXMtDeR/i0s=; h=From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=jJTn3IDrUZUnE0Sw2ZFHvVnvvqm/Ms/rrIaVaPhndlAJo/iWuLfuCwfPNAYgch0L7 anR+BAlWHOaiN/9FU87xlbt6ByfXkbtngbt7CqDNRbQRwI++hNrbdfVeligckYP+XG Y+10C04iRhG986AaUFmP2IdA6Wi6RMQEk9ZsLhU4=
Received: from mail-ua1-f49.google.com (mail-ua1-f49.google.com [209.85.222.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (not verified)) by mail.cec.uchile.cl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A687A0DE4; Tue, 2 May 2023 14:35:51 -0400 (-04)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.cec.uchile.cl 6A687A0DE4
Authentication-Results: mail1.cec.uchile.cl; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ing.uchile.cl
Authentication-Results: mail1.cec.uchile.cl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ing.uchile.cl
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.cec.uchile.cl 6A687A0DE4
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ing.uchile.cl; s=default; t=1683052551; bh=ePXh/BB92pUinNT9Kt8KSlYgLlEX0m/KwXMtDeR/i0s=; h=From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=jJTn3IDrUZUnE0Sw2ZFHvVnvvqm/Ms/rrIaVaPhndlAJo/iWuLfuCwfPNAYgch0L7 anR+BAlWHOaiN/9FU87xlbt6ByfXkbtngbt7CqDNRbQRwI++hNrbdfVeligckYP+XG Y+10C04iRhG986AaUFmP2IdA6Wi6RMQEk9ZsLhU4=
Received: by mail-ua1-f49.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-77d049b9040so14286357241.1; Tue, 02 May 2023 11:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyjBJnHRThqdgKJytb49SyTAxRRPZF63z7mTCBa2CWZnXmL6+VU KzSKNO6eDaOHDr0wAFs3KhakajEyW5F6Hwf3DxA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5P2hQeguu0s31rh9rPWd8+lybnCBGdOKf5LLlEuUU9f2dWVOGJZR2esYCi+s60uYxzwhEId9e5NMs01Ib6Ris=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:1491:b0:42e:63ad:f9b5 with SMTP id d17-20020a056102149100b0042e63adf9b5mr365998vsv.7.1683052550326; Tue, 02 May 2023 11:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Rodrigo Muñoz Lara <rmunozlara@ing.uchile.cl>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 14:35:14 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CALJ+G3VKHe5A8XrYpNqUWm7azZYYcoOccxJZJ7_E=ew4jVKJDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALJ+G3VKHe5A8XrYpNqUWm7azZYYcoOccxJZJ7_E=ew4jVKJDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: lp-wan@ietf.org, draft-aguilar-lpwan-schc-streaming@ietf.org
Cc: Sandra Cespedes <sandra.cespedes@concordia.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000066901505faba3551"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/X74QuKkI7rQNC-vVw_DiqaO2fA4>
Subject: [lp-wan] [lpwan] doubts and correction about schc_streaming draft
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2023 18:36:13 -0000
Hi all. I've reviewed the draft "draft-aguilar-lpwan-schc-streaming-00" and I've some doubts: * Must be the size of a sensor measurement equal to the SCHC fragment's payload? e.g., if the size measurement is 100 bytes, and the MTU is 222 bytes (AU915-928 DR5) Can I put two measurements in a SCHC fragment? Corrections: In Figure 2, the SCHC fragment with parameters (DTag= 0, W=3, FCN=0) is wrong. Says: DTag= 0, W=2, FCN=0. Must says DTag= 0, W=3, FCN=0 I will continue to review Thanks
- [lp-wan] [lpwan] doubts and correction about schc… Rodrigo Muñoz Lara
- Re: [lp-wan] [lpwan] doubts and correction about … Sergio Aguilar Romero