Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and new Compound ACK concept

Hi all,

I support option 2. This will help if other technologies also want to adopt
the compound ACK, provided that the new draft uses a generic definition.

Best,
Sandra

*Aclaración:* Debido al trabajo remoto durante la pandemia de COVID-19,
este correo puede llegar fuera del horario normal de oficina. A pesar de
que el horario de envío me acomoda, no implica que esté esperando respuesta
alguna en horario fuera de oficina.
*Disclaimer:* Emailing you now suits me due to remote working during the
COVID-19 pandemic, so if this email arrives outside office hours, please do
not feel you have to reply until regular working hours.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:09 AM Juan Carlos Zuniga <
juancarlos.zuniga@sigfox.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> As discussed over the LPWAN interim meeting, we have a few options to
> progress the documents:
>
>
>
>    1. Include in the SCHC/Sigfox draft [1] a Yang Data Model extension of
>    [2] to define the new SCHC Compound ACK as a Fragmentation parameter
>    2. Split the SCHC/Sigfox draft [1] in the following way:
>       1. Write a new draft to define the SCHC Compound ACK and the
>       associated extensions to the Data Model
>       2. Standalone SCHC/Sigfox profile
>    3. Extend the existing Yang Data Model draft [2] to include the SCHC
>    Compound ACK as a Fragmentation parameter
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-06
>
> [2]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-04
>
>
>
> Please reply if you have any views.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Juan Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lp-wan mailing list
> lp-wan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
>