Re: [lp-wan] Draft SCHC for CoAP -Title

Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io> Tue, 15 June 2021 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ana@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012223A2538 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TrHv0Vu55ah8 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE7433A2533 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id h3so14510503ilc.9 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EkxIacBgOS8muxALD746SqPrwqtIqBwJ1JOhIBs0pqo=; b=fK6BvaeyzposSNH7mR0tS77I8FpL7JDlvxx9yjTBKkXvY2yGHs2NkCJzYp61XxkslH xED6SWrhRlEhuyHD3zSAz0FagD3KVVql9UGF9eIxf1JmdGJDywuRisr4RtA9/NghydF1 dtqESOWCcdM5giBBfLg7gnvPC8ILlvBnz0R/86ZjMPPU1tzVXl1G+dw+QOIur3BWQg2i 1vIfZStbubBCdZDFFGWjSpqDex35wgcH6vKngaAJ07JPJSX8I9c5dgvJ2LUspV9OGN8w potTApdZXO0uu4xwzYn3PqVqClf3QS/y18GH6l6HCMKVoCKcUnl11lLrSLxZCYekRp9U jc5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EkxIacBgOS8muxALD746SqPrwqtIqBwJ1JOhIBs0pqo=; b=SXNdUxu7yoTXr8fZ4bEJH85rHqy3lSrJIBtmflrkwAwmH2r8bTfsYueZJxHbr8JgWg aBHDuv7X68gQ+mHaHhD9HC0nLwUQOfwrbDZtNyouCGiNZ34u5B+Dg+ongZJWWTd2Yhh8 AeSXneQj0gs74N7rD0hHk/espA6fY5IDX2W0UoFz+xyUCo0tGor7LK4om1xD2XFiCiWb QRy4OYalrAM/oNluiU6HHZpzt67uYTuZW4pwCJti6mb/MJ3WTzvquLmq7N1QblBqTlzE FBMdDaM/MKVTIx/zgNxdT8Hr4WMwilZ0vBLBbGnXdeWrOglnxafJq1ERK7UlWv/BOvLi GqOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530CYqTxyqc0Pmv7EKB/T/PhxlXBaNNP/i7BKTZqHTEzbRto650Y P/w+yehhXoqbo1hRsvKSS2duyDPQL1UEVZaTEXum1DgIA4bDXw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGdedpRw+k34472GuhL10RIt2S/jee47o4dHvJTJ1J+0RsfDsVkYpauJ+F8aJBj6GguKmVED7K5QFy2UgUFSo=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d08c:: with SMTP id h12mr16724394ilh.294.1623743567823; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAbr+nQJzZ242B9EhzqgaW40VMA=iXhpn743wC1PdQE2kDzZ=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB4881BC3131F02FB61ECCFB16D83C9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CABONVQYk4TH66r4OhvxPjQit2FPLBFZ-9vf_AEUBEL1oOZV+9w@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB488127CAF34ED3BF1F24B9DFD8359@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CABONVQYAwrgXwht4TkCpdD6f2wb+e0PiQVuMTYPCqbKn-EPU4A@mail.gmail.com> <9075_1623333886_60C21BFE_9075_26_1_8F1D83ADCC1AC94186A867BEE9B7D9137FD25015@OPEXCAUBM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20210612044818.GB4776@iisc.ac.in> <3335D031-3B7B-41BD-995E-8F52F87D1F0F@tzi.org> <MAXPR01MB2222C433FF3668E9DCA918B4FC339@MAXPR01MB2222.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <MAXPR01MB2222C433FF3668E9DCA918B4FC339@MAXPR01MB2222.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 09:52:21 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAbr+nRpY0PSZ=ar1ba0ppsUuGHx_9Wkj-aNmNvF1OuVuPUr-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lp-wan@ietf.org" <lp-wan@ietf.org>
Cc: Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>, "randreasen@fi.uba.ar" <randreasen@fi.uba.ar>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000912a0305c4c94291"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/Yqs6zHblPV4Jn6pY8IdM_TI1Agc>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] Draft SCHC for CoAP -Title
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 07:52:55 -0000

Hello friends!

Thank you for all your responses, so we have the following:

-Abbreviation Title -
7 votes   "SCHC for CoAP"

-Extended Title -

5 votes: "Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for Constrained
Application Protocol (CoAP)"

2 votes: "SCHC compression for CoAP"

3 votes: "Compression of CoAP using the SCHC framework


Well, I think that we can give the last consensus today during the meeting
But for me the winners:

Abbreviated: "SCHC for CoAP"
Extended: "Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for Constrained
Application Protocol (CoAP)"

Ana

On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 9:15 AM S.V.R.Anand <anandsvr@iisc.ac.in> wrote:

> Yes, I agree 🙂
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* lp-wan <lp-wan-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Carsten Bormann <
> cabo@tzi.org>
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 12, 2021 11:12 AM
> *To:* S.V.R.Anand <anandsvr=40iisc.ac.in@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Cc:* Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>; dominique.barthel@orange.com <
> dominique.barthel@orange.com>; Laurent Toutain <
> laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>; Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io>;
> lp-wan@ietf.org <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <
> evyncke@cisco.com>; randreasen@fi.uba.ar <randreasen@fi.uba.ar>
> *Subject:* Re: [lp-wan] Draft SCHC for CoAP -Title
>
> External Email
>
> On 12. Jun 2021, at 06:48, S.V.R.Anand <
> anandsvr=40iisc.ac.in@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> I feel full title is better. The abbreviated title is too terse and not
> user friendly; almost bordering on being impolite. It is just my
> impression.
>
>
> We need both; the abbreviated title is used for page headings and
> therefore needs to be short, but the main title is the one that will be
> seen in indexes etc.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
>