Re: [lp-wan] feedback on SCHC CoAP

Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr> Thu, 03 October 2019 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691C3120115; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 02:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=imt-atlantique.fr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PLUpvHRmMuNw; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 02:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr (zproxy120.enst.fr [137.194.2.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67A58120232; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 02:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9783080D78; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:54:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy120.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id SYhz6gL1q4AH; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:54:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0129680E06; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:54:36 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zproxy120.enst.fr 0129680E06
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imt-atlantique.fr; s=50EA75E8-DE22-11E6-A6DE-0662BA474D24; t=1570096476; bh=kcaukicL3YSgdOzOHUwdADruh8qWI3PeVKaHbROr2Bo=; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:To; b=JfPoNV3w8eX2RvVkelGakMFbdTBR2NXfDIJULaMwj0u3w7xVZx5sdhsD8PvBbxCw+ QVbA+NjtqpLuGJ/p26bA4cywL+eQG6sPd6XHijYfyXB4i96y4jlPB3n4U1Q/5i4YkJ 158SGYw8Bwj3lx94+687jkJGz1QKdsIvplkCvbIs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy120.enst.fr
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (zproxy120.enst.fr [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id EMuqAct114zO; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:54:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-yw1-f45.google.com (mail-yw1-f45.google.com [209.85.161.45]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A323980D78; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:54:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yw1-f45.google.com with SMTP id d192so784981ywa.1; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 02:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPXeUIJm50brMoA6Li7XdbGAIhMjU9Fw9U93wCnrfMLsrfqqZ+ 5BbUAv3WmkBgJWD9OdeMK1360PmFGfKSTCTNKto=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwSSRdpvUcIq5FdPyyoDyZVTCK14eVlF5IAyYHtD+oqeu/eWA0uXtF0Uv28zUMLInv40/zAyZ7WYbpuX1tj7f4=
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:e6c6:: with SMTP id p189mr5553848ywe.215.1570096473919; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 02:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR11MB35657EB347F4ADF557E17DC3D8810@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB35657EB347F4ADF557E17DC3D8810@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:53:57 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABONVQY3pBJTvN9N5VACvQa3twunZFJae5pfmzbBQ5xg_Tao3g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABONVQY3pBJTvN9N5VACvQa3twunZFJae5pfmzbBQ5xg_Tao3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: lp-wan <lp-wan@ietf.org>, "lpwan-chairs@ietf.org" <lpwan-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-coap-context-hc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-coap-context-hc@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lpwan-ipv6-static-context-hc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009758400593fe927e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/a2UaosqkAFcxQxiGa0mtrGibeKU>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] feedback on SCHC CoAP
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:54:41 -0000

Hi,

Sorry for the delay:

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Laurent

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 3:48 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> Dear all :
>
>
>
> We are looking for feedback on SCHC COAP for the publication process.
>
>
>
> Authors: please confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures
> required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have
> already been filed. If not, explain why. If you are not aware of any such
> IPR please answer with “No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this
> draft“ .
>
>
>
> All: IF you are aware of IPR concerning the draft that is not posted at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc
> please let the chairs know ,- there is no IPR reported as of today.
>
>
>
> All: If you are aware of implementations, please let us know which and
> whether it is open source or vendor..
>
>
>
> Many thanks in advance;
>
>
>
> The chairs
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lp-wan mailing list
> lp-wan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan
>