IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lp-wan] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8824 (7392)

Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io> Thu, 23 March 2023 09:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ana@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD465C15C2B1 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 02:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p22fhyxVnSKG for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 02:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A797C14CE52 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 02:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id p203so24018373ybb.13 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 02:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1679565207; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8LefJBZO+YZJfEZRlhXTZepoy9AqH1IcuC+lgJ7WUQ4=; b=sx4vvzy0z+QyE1/tIRHnEwep1WGKwj8kY21Yjw96ETL7qfYiDRdnY8bG3O23CdSdHe L+xmoyYg3Zz/elmtuvf08Q3yqwhlrlXw53U4lBQVXcDq5XHwkX3A4CRsLZAArXpEzY+p wEN7PjbEe96XHOAX9YlDYYZbKzuvH3Extyq/B89wqscnhgex1wbLJJpncaNG1SHPERFv C0whc2/SlOG8W9Ke0+bt/gL9a9+R0ru/8Yuv048DWK1/rew5dsFe99OYR9BUNMXtSnqk +czm62kEejcABK9OFSCZXnYwJNKWuO3QT5Yg7t/e4u+C3/vCb/6RKZ/uIdv9XOgPjy51 PvWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679565207; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=8LefJBZO+YZJfEZRlhXTZepoy9AqH1IcuC+lgJ7WUQ4=; b=EMdXKPwokWCvwYbV01H0KyNIAhArFtQMD1yKl2TwbYtHXPJnnqgDyotOPu3l7vKtbP dGIl+yKygKWTqpj7lWo9X8QUr/Gc2JGjlXq8IsUHIbLiwzpJ5npQbKb4c9HDumk0hOpX qtyVlQc9V7D3GRXpcnFknysBgQQGZMxZgSQ3xeCJJ4lVoaK5kcqsEmvuDC1xdXAfvtwW 9F5ohjs9ZSO5pASdbEmNwloaQ9xHqZUo+37Y0dSt8p6/8yQ9IaVdvbdDqBZWQ3GzoLbe DL/krGr6WmP/6KZfVb3H4jfTgwxG2WpY18q7hWtFDWs0e8sZDlHFfny7IJgvjspCZTk+ jatw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fpngNWycxOA6plSV3hILLvt3F/zJLcl5HTsEZzlQTDKJmrEO0j fTaLj3sBDCmEs4XXtY7G4v9b474Gno7HNMgS9fyyTQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZRM1PqrlLVdwSMh2EU6QCKYvWFfxb5LAKQ/WPf9AqLxvMWop8aud0u9r7GMhVLI0MFDa9h/eFIcx5l3sKdpmc=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:f407:0:b0:b6d:1483:bc18 with SMTP id q7-20020a25f407000000b00b6d1483bc18mr1830342ybd.7.1679565207355; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 02:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230319101923.0E8F156694@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230319101923.0E8F156694@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:53:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAbr+nQCTMBA=9=Nj8-vv-yVbZjAvNTBQJdzNVHmrFFHe_Me4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: marco.tiloca@ri.se, laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr, randreasen@fi.uba.ar, lp-wan@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008fdb5805f78e3fe9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/amZkZfocq1SQCpFPNJzoxn3TMsY>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8824 (7392)
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:53:33 -0000

Dear RFC Editor,

I'm rejecting this report,
Please verify below

Ana

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 11:19 AM RFC Errata System <
rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8824,
> "Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for the Constrained Application
> Protocol (CoAP)".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7392
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Marco Tiloca <marco.tiloca@ri.se>
>
> Section: 6.2
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Since the Observe Option MAY use a RST message to inform a server
> that the client does not require the Observe response, a specific
> SCHC Rule SHOULD exist to allow the message's compression with the
> RST type.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Since the Observe extension MAY use a RST message to inform a server
> that the client does not require the Observe response, a specific
> SCHC Rule SHOULD exist to allow the message's compression with the
> RST type.
>
> [Ana] as soon as I understand CoAP RFC7252 uses Options, and in the
RFC7641 Observe is also an Option, so I don't think that the change is
needed. Because Observe is not an extension.


Notes
> -----
> A RST message is not used by the Observe option itself, but by a CoAP
> client when using Observe.
>


>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8824 (draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for the
> Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
> Publication Date    : June 2021
> Author(s)           : A. Minaburo, L. Toutain, R. Andreasen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IPv6 over Low Power Wide-Area Networks
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email