Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and new Compound ACK concept
Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io> Tue, 22 June 2021 07:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ana@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989843A1A70 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o5uPatCZ4r4m for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132223A1A6D for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id v5so990512ilo.5 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vp8cX67EXk/6zIdrOQKyyiZgpap9ASUz5WgyJrsHtRw=; b=o06zeL9nSdZ1Z52IdU9kuW1G7vJ4EoeGtOOAAEReyTscTKovAiuYlavuKR1ID7zoZG rOeK648HExMZRzAC3t9QwLLaXaKArmbh+kORMXIcefSkrNT5SgaXjcZPdbnbE5+Y3QXk 6Cc1c9wQvvOSl9/WzFCza2EAYXOXMZLwofIB7eNG8HiQ168QXw6uPDj6Y8eVJsJWyxOq R6XnT0f2JKmesHzVL93LSQ8uuCQ4Zu+C6d5KwqTbazR5BfDax1uK94uXfa01U6yyAB7D 3yjkaDpZNMzS+pfKf+xs5+XmQZIzPtse1JqaCDdCVCbk16bmifx3YRoP1b7kKbUac8dW Wo1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=vp8cX67EXk/6zIdrOQKyyiZgpap9ASUz5WgyJrsHtRw=; b=saPNIK3AxGMuJE/iiyG/ILx5+BmpSDIN+oQC3ePhgbvqWT18WiiH4qe5KNL2OvYu/d avHE74Z70zISDiXP2mXdDjXeUcfY8weepqdIY3hnCfO5F91XrBt48qSNoeFttFitsgLO 16wT2VAIX1qL+2kRVqivUHjsJOM/C9hTZTKsvD6TGwWO9+KBvpog6zxqfB55nNRzUYNq vBR+WTs863ilKT90qmpOTD7Osw3IsS9LAclq7/aaV9d9y7aDKIFoGZS9W2QJB1I5gwUZ mWZgztJ0g8L+a62xTxGk/wkSkkpYuZxEK2NBlgYs5147zQBOL2mLu+fnnXyssiZJFAYw EomA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532VG2zS4+7sqxC0am3oLU10GcjZ6n66rsglMX5NKny0ZC9YmMw/ /PxqUW2CtLmnFGtTrTaCCdVjzwEFJ9AJvaDh7FJe6KhyIYo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqYvOa7QFH8vJaO0WbSMsJHLL5t1EyHo40mUpceHRop55LKDEresKqN3bhPQ3b1NIfRSrA0g/pgFGXUW+RnHY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:198d:: with SMTP id g13mr1708820ilf.41.1624348618314; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 00:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DB7PR08MB3179656613886143D1B8C3D489309@DB7PR08MB3179.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <50ec13e8-b550-d98d-bcd7-5b4c50d73e8d@niclabs.cl> <18289_1624084030_60CD8E3E_18289_209_1_8F1D83ADCC1AC94186A867BEE9B7D9137FD2AA2E@OPEXCAUBM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6e0a0b746171a80e3d8f303591b7a98d.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <6e0a0b746171a80e3d8f303591b7a98d.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
From: Ana Minaburo <ana@ackl.io>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 09:56:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAbr+nShBU2EBooXiTMODT0+dR-YECqq0ML580wJaRQaYFgY4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "lp-wan@ietf.org" <lp-wan@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000062edc005c556223f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/cFC-_wFqyLhoc0miJYzpI0P6TE0>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and new Compound ACK concept
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 07:57:05 -0000
Dear all, +1 for Option 2. Ana On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 12:11 PM Carles Gomez Montenegro < carlesgo@entel.upc.edu> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > +1 (for Option 2) as well. > > The Compound ACK extends the functionality defined in RFC 8724, and it may > be beneficial for several technologies. Therefore, it would be cleaner to > specify it in a generic, technology-independent way. > > Cheers, > > Carles > > > > > > +1 for Option 2. > > This is the cleanest way in the long run. > > Best regards, > > > > Dominique > > > > > > From: lp-wan [mailto:lp-wan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Diego S. > > Wistuba La Torre > > Sent: vendredi 18 juin 2021 19:17 > > To: lp-wan@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and new Compound > ACK > > concept > > > > > > Hi all. I also favor option 2 as it allows the SCHC Compound ACK to be > > defined generally with no constraints to any SCHC Profile (and cleaner > > referencing to the document that defines it too). Then it should be > > extended and adapted to Profiles that want to implement it using their > own > > parameters and algorithms. > > > > Best, > > > > Diego S. Wistuba La Torre > > El 15-06-2021 a las 11:09, Juan Carlos Zuniga escribió: > > Hi all, > > > > As discussed over the LPWAN interim meeting, we have a few options to > > progress the documents: > > > > > > 1. Include in the SCHC/Sigfox draft [1] a Yang Data Model extension of > > [2] to define the new SCHC Compound ACK as a Fragmentation parameter > > 2. Split the SCHC/Sigfox draft [1] in the following way: > > > > * Write a new draft to define the SCHC Compound ACK and the > > associated extensions to the Data Model > > * Standalone SCHC/Sigfox profile > > > > 1. Extend the existing Yang Data Model draft [2] to include the SCHC > > Compound ACK as a Fragmentation parameter > > > > [1] > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-06 > > [2] > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-04 > > > > Please reply if you have any views. > > > > Best, > > > > Juan Carlos > > _______________________________________________ > lp-wan mailing list > lp-wan@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan >
- [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and new … Juan Carlos Zuniga
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … Sandra Céspedes
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … Alexander Pelov
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … Diego S. Wistuba La Torre
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … dominique.barthel
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … Carles Gomez Montenegro
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … Ana Minaburo
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … Sergio Aguilar Romero
- Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and … Prof. Diego Dujovne