[lp-wan] interop for schc @ prague
Arun <arun@acklio.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 15:07 UTC
Return-Path: <arun@acklio.com>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317ED129B5C for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 08:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RQX5wgehDATa for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2017 08:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F7B129B2B for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 08:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mfilter29-d.gandi.net (mfilter29-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.160]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030951720A3 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 17:07:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter29-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.196]) by mfilter29-d.gandi.net (mfilter29-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K-i3wQV7-Kn2 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 17:07:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 192.44.77.207
Received: from [192.168.207.230] (nat-asr-incub-v207-1x.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [192.44.77.207]) (Authenticated sender: arun@acklio.com) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 815D31720CE for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2017 17:07:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Arun <arun@acklio.com>
To: lp-wan <lp-wan@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <43d320a7-aed7-9bde-3208-ce0c6f90b91a@acklio.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:07:06 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RmNSueKpMTkHuKseKwT6IauRrfLgLEWnv"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/hptaSxFMRKRwQOFR2sRFj8Q6Zns>
Subject: [lp-wan] interop for schc @ prague
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 15:07:19 -0000
Hello All, Since the drafts about the ip/udp/coap has been around for a while and nearing stability, many would have come up their implementations already. Do you think an inter-op for schc at the next ietf99, Prague would be possible to have? thanks, Arun