Re: [lp-wan] Options to progress SCHC/Sigfox and new Compound ACK concept

Hi all. I also favor option 2 as it allows the SCHC Compound ACK to be 
defined generally with no constraints to any SCHC Profile (and cleaner 
referencing to the document that defines it too). Then it should be 
extended and adapted to Profiles that want to implement it using their 
own parameters and algorithms.

Best,

/

*Diego S. Wistuba La Torre*

/
El 15-06-2021 a las 11:09, Juan Carlos Zuniga escribió:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed over the LPWAN interim meeting, we have a few options to 
> progress the documents:
>
>  1. Include in the SCHC/Sigfox draft [1] a Yang Data Model extension
>     of [2] to define the new SCHC Compound ACK as a Fragmentation
>     parameter
>  2. Split the SCHC/Sigfox draft [1] in the following way:
>      1. Write a new draft to define the SCHC Compound ACK and the
>         associated extensions to the Data Model
>      2. Standalone SCHC/Sigfox profile
>  3. Extend the existing Yang Data Model draft [2] to include the SCHC
>     Compound ACK as a Fragmentation parameter
>
> [1] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-06 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-over-sigfox-06>
>
> [2] 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-04 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lpwan-schc-yang-data-model-04>
>
> Please reply if you have any views.
>
> Best,
>
> Juan Carlos
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lp-wan mailing list
> lp-wan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan