Re: [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-architecture-01.txt
Olivier Gimenez <ogimenez@semtech.com> Tue, 07 December 2021 12:17 UTC
Return-Path: <ogimenez@semtech.com>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD09B3A159B;
Tue, 7 Dec 2021 04:17:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=semtech.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Pj5pxQvzbVYI; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 04:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta35.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta35.messagelabs.com
[67.219.250.114])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD883A159C;
Tue, 7 Dec 2021 04:16:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semtech.com; s=k1;
t=1638879417; i=@semtech.com;
bh=fpjjSEu8wId45uq4amexdV9G7V/K1sePmWORW4zOhsg=;
h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
b=V+tLbTz7uSuG8SwbCHIchtxCkVFa2BL1rAIpN02M54fu32Y5VRSvvCGZMefW2k8Aw
Asfa5j5zzGPOoV7t/HVJktOtZ5knTVTvCbJKpQQwRCFYjXV0fTGtjXuQ5bil5JLHtN
m2mKSTZbWuxkTkK7UAuQhsMvR9bKHsdYY9fhF2oy1hTaICXP5rHnLcDIJ8qiN+ktXM
x+COHTvMmWA5SiIN/3IJyAnZsMBdX5lB7o0dWZPrKogTNFnJvImogkPu1pzWD7/o7j
f6oVV1sjPZjaV+vs+q/a/gzIseFbVfFB2BW3Da5xJbHTsKrRXxbHTP/GoN0DM6f+DK
OIVA+Lg5LyOYA==
Received: from [100.114.97.172] (using TLSv1.2 with cipher
DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits))
by server-6.bemta.az-a.us-west-2.aws.ess.symcld.net id 10/EC-05825-9B05FA16;
Tue, 07 Dec 2021 12:16:57 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrFKsWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsXiofbjse7OgPW
JBu3nOSyW7HrObPFmlr0Dk8eSJT+ZAhijWDPzkvIrElgzNn+czVowhbuibfsptgbGkxxdjFwc
QgL3GSVO3nzDCOE8Y5RY+n0zM4Szg1GiZeseli5GTg42AR2J/89nsYLYIgKREptfLmADsYUF3
CROrTvADBF3l2j/3cUIYRtJ/JzezQRiswioSOztngNWwytgJbGkZQmYLSTgIrFixm6wGk4BV4
nOI5fAbEYBMYnvp9aA2cwC4hK3nswHsyUEBCSW7DnPDGGLSrx8/I8VwlaUOD1hA1S9jsSC3Z/
YIGxtiWULX0PtFZQ4OfMJC8ReRYnWaQuZJzCKzkKyYhaS9llI2mchaV/AyLKK0TqpKDM9oyQ3
MTNH19DAQNfQ0ARIG+laGuklVukm6pUW65anFpfoArnlxXqpxcV6xZW5yTkpenmpJZsYgRGWU
pQWs4NxW/9PvUOMkhxMSqK8FVrrE4X4kvJTKjMSizPii0pzUosPMcpwcChJ8H7zB8oJFqWmp1
akZeYAox0mLcHBoyTCy+MOlOYtLkjMLc5Mh0idYjTmmPBy7iJmjoNH5y1iFmLJy89LlRLnPQE
ySQCkNKM0D24QLAldYpSVEuZlZGBgEOIpSC3KzSxBlX/FKM7BqCTMWwQyhSczrwRu3yugU5iA
TonpXw1ySkkiQkqqgYkhm8ciOiVw+ZufnkIGfDxinA9bGdepzvgcwad+tTJ5bvJfoSiv47Y7d
6cfV65YqlHzKbb4jLOV18NPC3Pvc+YumfdSJ3C3MLfl8QsGeT+epG/sfaMQVZwx63Lswr2vBN
6oy989tdBrb1OLTcIfayuzPlnjrxo7M11Mdrk9OsBasCusNGL9guW5r5tKrlz7f4ezMOjgywa
DSQyf2C6+tN64bce63WF6j3hEXV/ffr/pR01l/S1LfYaXv/y+ZV7f+f78whuZDNuXCj3ReHW9
wdVwe0+UW9Zt0/M8u/7sFnaduipsUn+dovad9ksBFYeWZv1m3XDYuC+3/cu9w4UsS5b+LLrCH
ri/feY7q1fbTj9SYinOSDTUYi4qTgQA8J3fl70DAAA=
X-Env-Sender: ogimenez@semtech.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-634.messagelabs.com!1638879416!70436!1
X-Originating-IP: [72.38.248.227]
X-SYMC-ESS-Client-Auth: outbound-route-from=pass
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 9.81.7; banners=semtech.com,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 22001 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2021 12:16:57 -0000
Received: from s72-38-248-227.static.datacom.cgocable.net (HELO
ca01exedge1.semnet.dom) (72.38.248.227)
by server-8.tower-634.messagelabs.com with ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 encrypted
SMTP; 7 Dec 2021 12:16:57 -0000
Received: from ca01mail2.semnet.dom (10.2.50.41) by ca01exedge1.semnet.dom
(10.2.110.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.1034.26; Tue, 7 Dec 2021
07:16:25 -0500
Received: from ca01mail2.semnet.dom (10.2.50.41) by ca01mail2.semnet.dom
(10.2.50.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 7 Dec
2021 07:16:55 -0500
Received: from ca01mail2.semnet.dom ([fe80::fdc8:c457:b09e:605d]) by
ca01mail2.semnet.dom ([fe80::fdc8:c457:b09e:605d%22]) with mapi id
15.01.2176.012; Tue, 7 Dec 2021 07:16:54 -0500
From: Olivier Gimenez <ogimenez@semtech.com>
To: "lp-wan@ietf.org" <lp-wan@ietf.org>, "i-d-announce@ietf.org"
<i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-architecture-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHX4uCPCO94r7ZKmUGvd7g1UwA5Vqwm//Mg
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:16:54 +0000
Message-ID: <c11e22e7561a48c2bed9c5e12c72ca16@semtech.com>
References: <163794314048.21469.17075782597615850120@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <163794314048.21469.17075782597615850120@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.89.104]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/o0BLWkc6Doc8m6nppMhewSigdys>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-architecture-01.txt
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\),
also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>,
<mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>,
<mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 12:17:03 -0000
Pascal, All
I wonder if the chapter "7.1. Device Development" should be in this architecture document, in its own document, or even an RFC8724 extension.
I might have misunderstood (and in this case my comment is irrelevant) but I thought that "lpwan-architecture" is a high level introduction of SCHC applied to lpwan for people to understand the main concepts, and not in-depth explanation of the possible solutions to manage the rules, which also create new requirements "like Each rule set should have its own Uniform Resource Names (URN) {{!RFC8141}} and a version."
Best regards
Olivier
-----Original Message-----
From: lp-wan <lp-wan-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: 26 November 2021 17:12
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: lp-wan@ietf.org
Subject: [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-architecture-01.txt
Warning - External Email
________________________________
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 over Low Power Wide-Area Networks WG of the IETF.
Title : LPWAN Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) Architecture
Authors : Alexander Pelov
Pascal Thubert
Ana Minaburo
Filename : draft-ietf-lpwan-architecture-01.txt
Pages : 13
Date : 2021-11-26
To view our privacy policy, including the types of personal information we collect, process and share, and the rights and options you have in this respect, see www.semtech.com/legal.
- [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-architectur… internet-drafts
- Re: [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-archite… Olivier Gimenez
- Re: [lp-wan] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lpwan-archite… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)