Re: [lp-wan] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8824 (7397)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Thu, 27 April 2023 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE828C151B00 for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hCyoLZYauqbz for <lp-wan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ECC0C151B38 for <lp-wan@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15846424CD03; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GvkvdAxti6MW; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5E22424CD02; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.500.231\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230319103731.E2F0256694@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 16:44:50 -0700
Cc: marco.tiloca@ri.se, ana@ackl.io, laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr, randreasen@fi.uba.ar, lp-wan@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CF315CDA-0A8C-4ECC-B1AC-4A17B61162EF@amsl.com>
References: <20230319103731.E2F0256694@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.500.231)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lp-wan/qTrkO5qJaASSJp-jEvtZvVRb1r8>
Subject: Re: [lp-wan] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8824 (7397)
X-BeenThere: lp-wan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Low-Power Wide Area Networking \(LP-WAN\), also known as LPWA or Low-Rate WAN \(LR-WAN\)" <lp-wan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lp-wan/>
List-Post: <mailto:lp-wan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan>, <mailto:lp-wan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 23:46:09 -0000

Hi Eric,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. 
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7397

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Mar 19, 2023, at 3:37 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8824,
> "Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7397
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Marco Tiloca <marco.tiloca@ri.se>
> 
> Section: 7.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> These classes point out that the Outer option contains the OSCORE
> option and that the message is OSCORE protected; this option carries
> the information necessary to retrieve the Security Context.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> As per these classes, the Outer options comprise the OSCORE option,
> which indicates that the message is OSCORE protected and carries
> the information necessary to retrieve the Security Context.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> "Outer options" should be in the plural, to refer to the set of CoAP options left unencrypted. Such a set comprises also the OSCORE option, which is the actual indicator of the message being protected with OSCORE.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8824 (draft-ietf-lpwan-coap-static-context-hc-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Static Context Header Compression (SCHC) for the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
> Publication Date    : June 2021
> Author(s)           : A. Minaburo, L. Toutain, R. Andreasen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IPv6 over Low Power Wide-Area Networks
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>