Re: [Lsr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 21 August 2019 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F6D12010E; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=eniJtC3S; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=MGjmdJsc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2rvwTXtp7nOp; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24608120099; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3688; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1566424333; x=1567633933; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=zd4U56l+qlmWrLjSTS6h9QhM0Fmi1Ca61K/rshrryYU=; b=eniJtC3SMlFH3VQRWfF8hiIwbvSO1yNY/CiIrZ7Kv1iqGJWHA5mkLf5T oPmVNGHnXLZ4bVj+7os0pjnSzzwhLIfCoIBBMJWgciUc0Dar/cXHpTqGF 2xeGnH7Bag8oM2ScFOeQah8aY6p8EhubSu/McyBt/Zh1CwtSgACqLZJaP A=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AMyKLEx3SoNwmXW5IsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44?= =?us-ascii?q?YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxGCt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8TgZdYBUER?= =?us-ascii?q?oMiMEYhQslVceOBEDTJ//xZCt8F8NHBxdo?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CqAACJvF1d/5tdJa1kGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBZ4FFUANtVSAECyqEH4NHA4poglyXZYFCgRADVAkBAQEMAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?jCgIBAYQ/AheCRSM4EwIFAQEEAQEBAgEGBG2FJwyFSgEBAQECARIREQwBATc?= =?us-ascii?q?BDwIBCBgCAiYCAgIwFRACBA4FIoMAAYFqAw4PAQIMn1oCgTiIYXOBMoJ7AQE?= =?us-ascii?q?FgUZBgw8YghYDBoEMKItuGIF/gTgfgkw+gmECAQIBgSoBEgEfgwsygiaMQYI?= =?us-ascii?q?lMYUyliNtCQKCHYZoiVyDdRuCMYcwjmWVPpArAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFnIWdYEQh?= =?us-ascii?q?wFWUBgkGCQgwXg0+FFIU/cgGBKIlegkMBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,414,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="532131248"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 Aug 2019 21:52:10 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (xch-aln-011.cisco.com [173.36.7.21]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7LLqA4C004233 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:52:11 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:52:10 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:52:10 -0500
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:52:09 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=noygRPxGJrDL0l7YKoar0eTYLBIPCX2yrS8X7m6lr81HiRxfdPaKb7CNiHqGdSwbBijqukirPdsJFzqG8gSBv04+qO5lTWTO8MiigwhAmurMg3oA3FqpnEXr3J0H+/Aast+zmuknyuecfSogTWJCG3FJcurBOGCnGiBfNXAzCVaXFasrg5HKS1xBGK6zu1baT1GuzzsOOlbVvKKXsq+b5/XUgV6tvn4faX3Y0/dd1ht9LTFN0hKiAnvsF2AEitO0HtLBXXyaoyscICCEVSWg9ewnQ2hOw2UITxnOaFZS5UK3qd3lJ5HYrPgDW9ybpS1vvrJy2gVmIYvefCjnpOFPPg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=zd4U56l+qlmWrLjSTS6h9QhM0Fmi1Ca61K/rshrryYU=; b=BKmy03+M/IPdBOP8zTwfNcWFdn2g84+emyGb1TH+0nguOpuzIT85n3yRIdXZfzUBS+tQqLP/ncwF0/V3LLetI1ixsIn9tdmJnTJg25DtVSE4li+9zC+9My9WM8nq/8LKPlvrdjCTmVZs+ZW8IZLBVU/yfRVebhhU+AHw1+VjIkL9504eZGaPl7owQsEd0WKWbtTc33X6kz0/bDLHCu2KHFbtpOGdYpwUKyW6+O5ieMvvDWhx1PGg5tOlI9EZexhGSC04FJWP8gM82TwExwju2xC6kp1u2qvVrXrToIsgAl96nW74PmG3AIl1uAJvCAFIWvHvUO/X5oewj5uWI5M41w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=zd4U56l+qlmWrLjSTS6h9QhM0Fmi1Ca61K/rshrryYU=; b=MGjmdJsc6jcaeIR6MZzqAbVDfVRB5eMzkVMkXAfBjbKL63If59UN49mJOXiBVudLqbo2aBs5QmMhP/SroZgOMHBqfFc3NJ2MNJxmDEM1p/2dKm/puIdebOXo+MK+8+iFSZWdfroAERwvLrc0dSu7WhPV29mUYN7jkU5xgoWXmGk=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2178.18; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:52:08 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2178.020; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:52:08 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
CC: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-yang@ietf.org>, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVWCR+bWYOtAYse0y+yJucqxzWxqcFkNiAgAB79oD//9U2AA==
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:52:08 +0000
Message-ID: <A85BBAAC-76AB-4A6C-A88C-72C04615B0ED@cisco.com>
References: <156639417401.25695.14193697218719481421.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3C6675D0-AFE8-46C2-BF6A-12FA19787A9C@cisco.com> <5AA3EA7D-04DC-4B60-9305-B8AFA465FDCB@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <5AA3EA7D-04DC-4B60-9305-B8AFA465FDCB@cooperw.in>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::de]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cf15355b-82e1-4d23-af49-08d72681d082
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB4144;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4144:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4144F6126FD1061AF08D3E7BC2AA0@MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0136C1DDA4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(199004)(189003)(60444003)(966005)(14444005)(91956017)(256004)(66556008)(86362001)(229853002)(316002)(53546011)(305945005)(6506007)(7736002)(6246003)(36756003)(478600001)(8936002)(54906003)(6916009)(76116006)(25786009)(4326008)(53936002)(33656002)(76176011)(81166006)(81156014)(99286004)(14454004)(2616005)(66946007)(6436002)(6116002)(186003)(476003)(46003)(486006)(6306002)(5660300002)(6512007)(71190400001)(102836004)(446003)(11346002)(71200400001)(6486002)(2906002)(8676002)(64756008)(66446008)(66476007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4144; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: kHyVkDvnjWuWjLe6RR3cq8NwEfjuuemti2pB1zgzpeOsqOuGpwLL9cwIzKSwMOu4QiZLICKn2yHKf/gQxs3E4iLj2DJiCm8UVBYun1H61C2ryX8gC+mc7mPgYSv3GJaF1kVBuQc4GV1/V4KQvrctoXnuzM9qHcfbQCJ96loGMQVcxVxS0fXiQgJKaD22CjIegbyiU7VfwV+jdIka6x1v2c5afJU5ODxtd8B9wYEVjwfesjzSrebn9y8pX0fZekrLvtkxwadIDO7StbO6QzcrLnhCC2Xm6yZYJSJc2rBqu7oY2Wyk6eEaBe2t0WdYR3bScCa5DKUqOo+2vXdNZpgYjZSpmg6edh/YARWrMr9fAuvi9pnASG6w38g8xnB64UHycMiR62h/ibWmuCjOx7bWmLbtqotHEaZbjAmaroT53Ak=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C627CE349B0F4940B56DCFCBC2B82C16@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cf15355b-82e1-4d23-af49-08d72681d082
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Aug 2019 21:52:08.5757 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: h7glCmyo0HcTR9UQwm8b8o3n5AEN4EbzYFTX4VzJ2hh3FruFl2mVjQkOfr+NLOkm
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4144
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.21, xch-aln-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/-Lm3B_a5olIBLJLM5DIQbX-jZgA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:52:17 -0000

Hi Alissa, 

On 8/21/19, 4:25 PM, "Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in>; wrote:

    Hi Acee,
    
    > On Aug 21, 2019, at 1:01 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>; wrote:
    > 
    > Hi Alissa,
    > 
    > On 8/21/19, 9:29 AM, "Alissa Cooper via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org>; wrote:
    > 
    >    Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
    >    draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: No Objection
    > 
    >    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    >    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    >    introductory paragraph, however.)
    > 
    > 
    >    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    >    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    > 
    > 
    >    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    >    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    > 
    > 
    > 
    >    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >    COMMENT:
    >    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > 
    >    Per the Gen-ART review, I think 2.3 may be a little clearer if it were to say
    >    "The field 'version' is used to indicate the OSPF LSA version and is mandatory."
    > 
    > This change has already been made in response to the Gen-ART review.
    
    My specific suggestion was to include “LSA” after “OSPF” since that seemed to be the source of the confusion.

This wouldn't be the intent since the version impacts more than just the LSA formats. For example, authentication options:

      case ospfv3-auth-ipsec {
          when "derived-from-or-self(../../../../../../rt:type, "
            +  "'ospfv3')" {
            description "Applied to OSPFv3 only.";
          }
          if-feature ospfv3-authentication-ipsec;
          leaf sa {
              type string;
              description
                "Security Association (SA) name.";
          }
    }


Thanks,
Acee
    
    Best,
    Alissa
    
    > 
    > 2.3.  OSPFv2 and OSPFv3
    > 
    >   The data model defined herein supports both OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
    > 
    >   The field 'version' is used to indicate the OSPF version and is
    >   mandatory.  Based on the configured version, the data model varies to
    >   accommodate the differences between OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Acee
    > 
    >    I did not review this entire document but I'm balloting based on the Gen-ART
    >    review.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    >