IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Available Bandwidth erratum 5486 [was: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14]

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 28 November 2018 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01C9128BCC; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:01:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SlnB9-swqSEC; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:01:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x231.google.com (mail-oi1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E85E131056; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x231.google.com with SMTP id u18so24133742oie.10; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:01:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/PPb8N3xbT4cq4uz5AURzL2BXevyP2baAZNnAhnoi0w=; b=sIl+LOKhsfVziZkUbt579lzBj5wiABbqm5r+BBR1V+eh5fKx35ubgceLYsLump6xtQ kSIQ24CORfsgOZwSPWRfpJbI/pxj+YbHfl52fDlmiZ8SVL4wW0zD8RG6IqB2LmHESQL+ KNQ0M9CbouyLZlzaiyUUG3Esght71rBRLl5ERA4WalWl5xGD3/X5z7XcrhXs8ZWmKJ1X ohw4BgQ9hZDdHqUORow7VEcGaHk5Z+HsKLvk+LBH4CO7IaXkYfH0g9/vkidjnGVhe6Y1 fxZl5gnF50uQdGO8pkLJ/a3EWzY3G6EUk1vgWJy28i4JuWVOPPK02ZDFWe8eu0Ua/ZuT mH0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/PPb8N3xbT4cq4uz5AURzL2BXevyP2baAZNnAhnoi0w=; b=FkIpGQjsg+QtnAuEAZ+P5DqZf+Iatvh2pzym1BOUZ66BGFXhJ4T5cO40XqDo2BQRHm daaQAyqbVH0CwZChmtJBAEWXXnfc/yELo7IIUqbirkrHxHwMCTq4xzIEUDROT9T/SDV+ sMvS8+FggKz2CqPxc+crU0GpFdhBwUn3ynKGSflIM8Fa6sCELLsTxshR1sFAQqvLAp4f NQl9TDxaJ6HSH3ZC5Rs3KV8WYltHbtN1aR9IEVsR4CAp7Ypf+4ivpyZ0nljNdRIje+id wE/5Myp4JmTixeXsjGjBydDKAJTuU8aLT57zmYkZdqVMHOCCAwBl69OR3Sgkx4SJKIrg 4ZdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZM7V1toB9adSNLoYt1s/MznSMbYMMWrXoNOyfl1IN5ksoDRyia hj2orFbcDqOe/9bWe/mSIcYKcHRJka6qoI1iUac=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Ux+RdHu+IVCXTRMmiUhbPun7udm7eV9qLhRxOJJJkFSGjPWAzovCyRmbWifaQtytwOMVO6Jj5RE7TtbaxYFjc=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:e603:: with SMTP id d3mr19574505oih.289.1543446063556; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:01:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 18:01:02 -0500
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0036030cefb74a5385c47470e8e71250@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <CAMMESsyXWjVrCMG83HUUmMrSNzUvPvdRE6PSa7OAmOJgNtzMpg@mail.gmail.com> <130DB3CF-2B31-4CAE-ABE6-E1B79A330820@juniper.net> <CAMMESsxSkg-Gqrn3ny_4ntp=AxfZGRvN0_ah+1sLPsyq1wdbNQ@mail.gmail.com> <EA69FF7A-F255-4735-8BFA-6E02EF0025AA@juniper.net> <CAMMESswRVQVMQKOMD07kPZZH3=wV63k7n+CqhTnyKPHkw9-+0g@mail.gmail.com> <0036030cefb74a5385c47470e8e71250@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail (528)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 18:01:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMESsyTptXbjBfT-m_1iwkayRvTmZ7uCsjQdW=5gSdzWZJ3Sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis@ietf.org>
Cc: Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000592fa8057bc18a8a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/-_GojVoeUrE0hrWvGaBRwGSpmBA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Available Bandwidth erratum 5486 [was: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14]
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 23:01:08 -0000

On November 28, 2018 at 5:46:08 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (
ginsberg@cisco.com) wrote:

Les:

Hi!

As lead author on rfc7810bis I am happy to modify the language to be
consistent with RFC7471. That seems like the far easier pathway so long as
we have your assurance (which it seems we do) that this will not unduly
delay progress of rfc7810bis.

I already requested the start of the IETF LC for rfc7810bis.  I don’t think
the potential changes we’re talking about will be that significant to delay.

I do find that the fact that you raised this issue in the context of
draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp rather confusing (though I can appreciate that it
was your review of the idr draft that brought the discrepancy to your
attention).

Yes, draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp was simply first on my queue…so I read it
first.

It would have been less confusing – at least to me – if you had raised this
point in a separate email regarding rfc7810bis.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/92-08uCr6-ctnRU9i3FHA-ucFEw

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email