IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ

Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> Tue, 14 July 2020 04:20 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5C73A0D72; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MzLBg4jQGq_b; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A2E13A0D70; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id k5so922897pjg.3; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=NBVdMW294IP/yinLDaLEtB434TVO0tRtc6NSb761FvI=; b=t3M7H4nuHDWa1JeLORJ25nb+0qnqH+oCIKzga4Eqwq/mq4+cIUCRMBCgEFj1s2c5iz bTdZtUOzlO85GUmu4B7/88hg078QP/4J1eRUtwwpligo/gC8HHhlYfVqFK30UomVKVnx SmgxTiPdzqnh8ZQ+EqxBZy5KAoW6w8T4y50UJg/B3RQCeLRwDXq0bZLjaYgjYOWTw29v Ht5CsgzZM6pO0jTu9XsYbbGz3w0Q+tBaDLKpAhBGqIMdBZc/Hal1HUq6NW3oagfA7jww 6hCkB+b4RZmFPX3y7zU5TKjGQl0WYZBESDC4uagPf/RhFsHQiV9oJrPPl6f3TPhLxibI V8lA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=NBVdMW294IP/yinLDaLEtB434TVO0tRtc6NSb761FvI=; b=J7osH/0pt3lVz/p1loxd/2SemzAGZlyid7FvEzOeYRsWesGIgarv+dRhm1rn0YUATE ToA8LZdbprbH07qjS5npNkUhxnYsxIZxs3qjB9BuU4BwSOSGSxpnEMp6nOZ8QC93+L3y 4RujI0BeMeaObhOY0q82S0QEKOBngH8JSDZj2y1GcMwacTOtKaADwLFFabwvh2CQkvXC Y/GdLB6J+SsxxiqF56BqTD/NnYXAE64rLvrb4aMlPJ/1luN1DrffrA7aSUNI8/QR7xp7 3muF0VIm2vXRT16zlZdhweqOcAg3KBAAYTdM+sBo/ZPnW3y4HbSG1UgzxeXuRFgiD8Hg xPOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5307VjsjZQH6KqhtvxjlXFTg4ppNVRLtWRRTFuOkKxPvDBGxC+Jn QX5BMtK67ZyZ/+QGwFRt2GEvR5ti
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+gabH6ybC55KvXoVtiFiCFC/+Pzr+8QzpZTc3Nim1wbHKH3V/SAyQKccMAq0IVJ9OD57kNA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1b44:: with SMTP id nv4mr2664052pjb.84.1594700440494; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.95.82.9] ([162.210.129.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f18sm13803442pgv.84.2020.07.13.21.20.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3C629384-87DA-4558-9C56-EA75AFDFD75E@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B5F923F8-7525-4380-BE30-35AD100BC9EC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:20:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB3117E81B8CA6A298742C01D1F2610@MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@futurewei.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB31178756BB6166B2F1807CF6F2980@MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CAF4+nEHB+C8n22F-60FXYa5JXoFHxH9oDg0ANsWd4V_fdW9EiQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR06MB509884AFCDB21593E2B4389DEE630@DM6PR06MB5098.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR13MB243779757964C2D31BB1AEB2D9600@BYAPR13MB2437.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB3117E81B8CA6A298742C01D1F2610@MN2PR13MB3117.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/07_ezzY6HpV53Ab5juaTJqJSGYo>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Request WG adoption of TTZ
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 04:20:42 -0000


Hi Huaimo,


> 1).  It seems that Area Proxy can not be amended to IS-IS TTZ. 



I feel that this is somewhat imprecise.

From my perspective, our attempts to collaborate have been hampered by governmental regulations that are wholly out of our control. The suggestions that I’ve made for continued collaboration within the bounds of those controls have not been well received. Thus, to say that something cannot be done is overstating the case.  We have simply not been wiilling to do so, which is most unfortunate.  Who can say what could happen if we could find a way for all three proposals to collaborate?

Regards,
Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email