IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

"Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com> Mon, 17 December 2018 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <naiming@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DB212D4E6; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:22:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.96
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QQdT6uIq7a5K; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B569126C01; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 15:22:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6750; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1545088966; x=1546298566; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ZKKNpzHtOkU/kTqKfZQcms0QBBrJ/uxz/DGZcwnLxNw=; b=SZ3DeShTqkTxFHbAOrggPj1Cb3kZKjCiLxspxzziawWQAvF1qxo6/blf Odm1S9gV01PzWb0TbobXs+ESXyw4xrQwlu3K3c/L2JUYogYurezzOrOxx u75sJZtxXWeps6QXRK4SHTaznG/9IKSGe5SGxwVylOWwJy54oUk0vGomN Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAABhLxhc/5FdJa1lGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ12ZoECFBMKjAuNYZIihVsUgWcLAQElhEcCgxQiNAkNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFPQZuBgUQAgEIPwcyFBECBA4FgyIBgRxkD6k7iicFjD4XgX+BECgME4JMgx4CAgEXgRQBEgGDWIImAokwhgWGU4sRCQKHC4pNGIFdhRyKWYhwCYU5iwsCERSBJx84KD1xcBU7KgGCQYJQiEyFP0ExDowqgR+BHwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,366,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="496700802"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Dec 2018 23:22:31 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wBHNMVH8030447 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Dec 2018 23:22:31 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:22:30 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:22:30 -0600
From: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
CC: "draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext@ietf.org" <draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07
Thread-Index: AQHUlg8VAsj6zMUsAU+gPi4TuTpt2KWD9ziA
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 23:22:30 +0000
Message-ID: <40711318-BF7D-4386-B122-FFFA9563A452@cisco.com>
References: <7A4F8A6D-5143-4652-8919-E8AD45FB5B82@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7A4F8A6D-5143-4652-8919-E8AD45FB5B82@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.208.151]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_40711318BF7D4386B122FFFA9563A452ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/0OghH65V_RwFryJusWImrlY6Bp4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 23:22:48 -0000

Hi,

I am not aware of any IPR applies to draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext.

thanks.
- Naiming

On Dec 17, 2018, at 5:47 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:

Authors,

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There are currently no 3 IPR disclosures so everyone should be aware of these - https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email