IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 03 March 2021 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525193A1330 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 05:56:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xnjhqvLPQUIb for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 05:56:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB4833A132F for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 05:56:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id 18so28655032lff.6 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 05:56:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wHr1BfYONuFOn2guP1ZZar1oJ3C4egdTjCV2j/PL7xw=; b=SJSFnM7y1LsBBJwoH8yF6sgKkGb+GeTcD3PKDgFyclqvIaBzYcE6xNLmoVbCUprJoX MZXn4BFI7O+B6X6ny7Gc2HWXcQS9EBHu0J11nVUWJoo7gXwew6f/6QBgm1M/yc4IPpst iAZ9h0RZiG8DNeF+aCMsClfYUv2oeZyuKxyCRALuzHPUQU6q5lVKi4SdVslQktOu97Tj YUCRdqKLnuwmG74k7RQKFEWm83LssoEaSGiKkCUdsQ6IzOxxucWYAJNTOvwiUbuepPMB 5rTPzqeEiRXWCBquxh8e1fMHYSdlD90K5YgYvLVlMiYtmV10NpNkpDurbWy41nlu/sFt 6n4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wHr1BfYONuFOn2guP1ZZar1oJ3C4egdTjCV2j/PL7xw=; b=oeNYVbBs/MXnANM9MvRUc9/LZ0nlz75+ZykSYvu8awNktKbs8rxCOLkUP0f6eU2F8h Nc2a8U7tp7wSXQjahEjnU9BnYhXy4n7no2d1nEQ4xJGkO3wsVvJBkxBl1m/8TWJwTnZg 0YI4Nd7z/KcltImEc7McmHBgopQ1dLu77mdzFBCjH2j0nS/djHcKmJiGC3bpznHeBim+ iqeJjdLNgMmUID11f1pAZvTMQzJ0OPbATdcIWErFUIuB/sQBwi5wBOUAClph3VpMR+A4 D5Mnv4dQz5BBFkZRTCTuU3u9xjSTvZSxGkDAiRLUwSVjlkqKGcyz83VYXMUmkhfoar4H 7qiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531IykseQXOe9xci6Bmsydk+MNpJR3ykRCUbcSqL+NdNNeQK+BSb FuK70jZ1iYRlhLkmK05S5N4u3Lmby9lR5YHarswxIw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIQdmR85XcoOThG3vRJRZP13zDt7qRuWx7vS2Ssaud+uKhnLOyYjBRyHqpKBZ/7djgSToHaE256lXyGYAEJDQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:712:: with SMTP id 18mr15211571lfh.591.1614779759209; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 05:55:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161401476623.19237.3808413288895066510@ietfa.amsl.com> <DM5PR0501MB380079CFD75C78610130D81BCD9D9@DM5PR0501MB3800.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHKazMG3wnUA+Kd2wg2hfr01CdF5w5YYKdFaHU4_V+0SA@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV0UKB=HaMs9eLvvp4fVLPsEtJhQ2xFmwY80sqBNDFRudQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM5PR0501MB38006C4B638AD2AB6A7731B5CD9A9@DM5PR0501MB3800.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <7C67D01F-24DB-4450-8587-E004CAFBBEBC@tony.li> <CAOj+MMGZppwYtNr4t0rJoy3BKWaBYqHiJ_esM1XNFTNxbm8c5w@mail.gmail.com> <08882555-009B-4068-ABB0-20B0D165D722@tony.li> <2c2605a8-95c6-a477-b1b5-5ae4d4de222a@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMGf=zQMGP+q+XX-MJi-qMrOddmq_+wmrXFS+JQX_PsudQ@mail.gmail.com> <25a8853a-72a3-3013-6a87-d8049ed7a3da@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMH2a=T-vBsD6QVChmybmdQhQXFcDg1np+v+bpKOWPbtKA@mail.gmail.com> <8be3198f-4c9c-2bae-9ce9-f283ac5305a1@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMFf_QymQLOG4mR9F_3h-njo0k2Le6eE1bKUkK6NmcLboQ@mail.gmail.com> <42fbaa46-7434-39fb-b5a1-97fe0c7866d3@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMG5j=HcZhtni+ROVU4zjzgHDKQhNmgxpBqpx97Jf3uU4w@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR05MB3576051C31A5A8DD704B8378D5989@CY4PR05MB3576.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMG5PkA6tsSNUu54HWBYrrWW5FgZzvndm5wTY5L8PXm8iw@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR05MB357694774EA7040EDA8C90D3D5989@CY4PR05MB3576.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR05MB357694774EA7040EDA8C90D3D5989@CY4PR05MB3576.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 14:55:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMGwmf=q0zCbM5E1WvVgqGqmL4C=OLzRVfUNywp73FJ1ww@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
Cc: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, Rajesh M <mrajesh@juniper.net>, DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, William Britto A J <bwilliam@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f048ce05bca23528"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/0TqhgYMh2mLKQUTof8Vl1F4GawE>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 13:56:06 -0000

> Yes your proposal defines constrains for FAD. But ny point is that if you
> are defining such constrain called Max Link Delay you better make sure that
> parameter used to measure such Maximum is well generated and flooded.
>
> <Shraddha> The Maximum delay in FAD is compared against min delay
> advertised per link as  in RFC 8570.
>
>                        so maximum delay is not required to be generated
> and flooded  for every link.
>

I was talking about requirements of generation and flooding of  min delay
for the needs of this new constrain.

Thx,
R.

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email