[Lsr] Question about OSPF (transit area routing loop)

Sergey SHpenkov <sergey.v.shpenkov@gmail.com> Sun, 23 February 2020 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sergey.v.shpenkov@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE993A0E3D for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 15:39:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08=1.651, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bAeOZUc_OxMH for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 15:39:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76A253A11F9 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 15:39:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id v13so6249649iln.4 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 15:39:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5nFwhYJmomSDMq8UiN4bNTf1ZIybqYeOXHe50APKD8Y=; b=jlL69zwmZ6jl6liSwfNkms+VrO9lBzmLnAfZI3HzsstJsDHaMe7iPvilgOvGD8I/s/ 7K079lVNHhK3omFC1uHbMT5RC6BSNo+vGzlrVAxBc8dYUVoHjtDI+ocJAm0q4/NzeCOU Zqg3pbOEav+eTy8yEOentrwJZ56a6WV7RLaBJkDPbbBIQ0B7RU32Bjib+shAvebbUgk6 vceo+SDhvYxjVdHkbb7nqbKDiPHFp5769QXDRElDgh8w6xqS6i10KKJpYbM28Xz1RKgg rswORhQf0xUQuHFeXTbt+kLSdFwLY1dQfjhQSfknei4THu2uP+5/ZRQAqBLvqH4GezoG 9kAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5nFwhYJmomSDMq8UiN4bNTf1ZIybqYeOXHe50APKD8Y=; b=QWAI+AL7XI0ibKaA6P0tt4z1rftRbb66pNALggOvQOaD49QamAeM93mGzaTfYOdzE6 oEkBVjbFBa1a9LUoWDxgfeVh3epAvHs7ptbLETbQta8Jr8dlh1KFP7AKuGIGNy2cGLkA b8PyLycwgfVeCvuQ87SCQRqbk2970FesbxJGe4G5yV3qGBlvB4Sn32rzlviOvIA7DyHG 9eOmp+UUuCBxYKcVhNRmaQ3KuuZIlix49h8grVDWLtxEYXvKFmCPfFkdBOspNeTf3h0q DgTSVHOW1woXriOwIioingaInLLLLh64+jTDcQXDvGOZIPfZHIj3IBN1upAf3wv302TH 85pA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWF6wy0cA5/cTVXUiR+phzdqfkinJQ7nvJLiYscNgDaSI/JcoQB dzo4p3Law9iN+mJvEvEPKK02vQz8BVr3v3Q0jnNIX11M
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzL1GECGvPdeICcEg4nxEyYw3IFeZzNtRGimZX3/zOLVMI4WiNSl+kSufY7PT0m78xnOObKg62c0LYTs9Su9u4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:b74c:: with SMTP id c12mr50078490ilm.154.1582501170119; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 15:39:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Sergey SHpenkov <sergey.v.shpenkov@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 02:37:19 +0300
Message-ID: <CAD4HJpqOJC0DSeb_nrPOD3=bofRLgWzFhRrzXMnrtZRr0XNjsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: lsr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="0000000000001ac16a059f46c45b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/2ITMjDRt_bmvoe44QRe8KJX_Swg>
Subject: [Lsr] Question about OSPF (transit area routing loop)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:38:18 -0000

Hi,

In section 16.3 of the OSPF RFC 2328 standard, it is stated that all ABR
routers
connected to a transit area are required to check the sumLSA contained
within
this area in order to possibly improve the intra-area and inter-area
backbone routes
for themselves.

See the picture:
[image: VL_Loop.PNG]
The RT_1 and ABR_3 routers will use different paths to the ASBR router:

ABR_3 -> RT_1 -> ABR_1 -> ASBR = cost 3
RT_1 -> ABR_3 -> ABR_2 -> ASBR = cost 21

route loop between RT_1 and ABR_3

Please explain this situation

Thanks,
Sergey