Re: [Lsr] IETF 102 LSR Working Group Call for Agenda Items

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 06 July 2018 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B26C131012 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iT-9ETbrpVKA for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBDA8130FDF for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 06:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11172; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1530884690; x=1532094290; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=E2ZVjfXsaCDVc9qmx97LJ9QzOixHzhNLVxLhpjA3S+0=; b=Mgn011xCiTfQap5g44EH/2ASat5Fg2rAjBPul1tXcZCxMM+DRzLWV2xV xHtZkW2U4mUYyeVta7rkZJVc31/cJegKnLq3pUknqe/BC1gHemYTdbOLU kMDOc0h4ogoWuoPvcLYzwQRGt6dO98a0WG6e/FtIjIaD76n0mrSBHD82Q I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CcAgDM+T5b/4kNJK1cGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBAYJTdmJ/KAqYKYFlIpAihQ6BegslhEcCgi0hNRcBAgEBAgEBAm0cDIU2AQEBAQMdXBACAQgRBAEBKAcyFAkIAgQOBYMgAYEbZA+rMYRbg3SBNQWIbYIVgTYMgi4ugUGBVwIDAYISgnyCJAKRaodlCQKGBIkcgUCEDIgMijWHLwIREwGBJB8BNSaBLHAVZQGCPoIwiGSFPm+OOIEaAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,316,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="138865480"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jul 2018 13:44:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w66DinOA004951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Jul 2018 13:44:49 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:44:49 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:44:48 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] IETF 102 LSR Working Group Call for Agenda Items
Thread-Index: AQHUFPkeTNqsE7TLkkCbnub2VqRERKSCeB2A
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 13:44:48 +0000
Message-ID: <70C116FC-16C1-4099-99E8-3CF6421448DF@cisco.com>
References: <2271245A-3BAF-4E6F-9C6F-790066BBC1A2@cisco.com> <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFAC8E0F95@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFAC8E0F95@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.206]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_70C116FC16C1409999E83CF6421448DFciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/34myGKQSpN9_0QrK3-m-pEzJ5RA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IETF 102 LSR Working Group Call for Agenda Items
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 13:44:59 -0000

Hi Zhibo,

As I told you, the LSR WG agenda is fully subscribed for IETF 102. Note that dynamic metric adjustment is not a new idea and is supported by many wireless routing protocols (e.g., BABEL) as well as EIGRP. However, I realize that you are proposed a controller framework as opposed to local network adjustments. Perhaps, you could request a slot in the Routing Working Group as they are meeting twice.

Thanks,
Acee

On Jul 6, 2018, at 3:15 AM, Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com<mailto:huzhibo@huawei.com>> wrote:

Hi,

Request a slot to discuss Network Automatic Optimization Based on Dynamic Adjustment of IGP Metrics:

Drafts:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hu-lsr-network-automatic-optimization/
Presenter: ZhiBo Hu

Duration: 15 mins

Thanks!
ZHiBo


From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 9:45 PM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] IETF 102 LSR Working Group Call for Agenda Items

Hi Folks,

The LSR (link-state-routing) WG will be meeting on Monday, July 16, 2018 from 9:30 to 12:00 (the first WG slot of IETF 102).

Please send us (lsr-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-chairs@ietf.org>) any requests for presentation slots.

Thanks,
Acee