[Lsr] On collaboration for abstraction
tony.li@tony.li Thu, 02 April 2020 22:07 UTC
Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1513A0AD5 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id evL530sMvoMX for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231A83A0AD9 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 15:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id fh8so2087591pjb.5 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :message-id:date:to; bh=vfQf5ORVvcA7O97ZlhreA7ZB7BaYGszO3j8/F0G7x6o=; b=IzL2Gn5T7waf2vCd0L0j5VFDCxKwyjQH9oP5AFHLehG0MoyqGrsaGKdZgh6czRN6Km xfsZ08fnAC028zWZ+6vtNiIx+g9sbZephscIbikWEEK5Xv8mJDojssRoxFKBwBad9tEk sRz+dDjotgkvEaqB+okG20CMtFLP3QITqknWVg/LJLnYVVzhcpM8cXnXhmqoOyUvdDXS byyTPq5zG79GQu/7VKMsrZSUaCDBKlek95Pgs9BQAJ1oiY9tlQM532vUwHo+cNtGGHEd GKuB1DHDSPXN8q0A14z2ih6b+Dk75cDhTKVku7qMP+E2+h49gIGX5TQ3CWiMikZhm+yn En+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=vfQf5ORVvcA7O97ZlhreA7ZB7BaYGszO3j8/F0G7x6o=; b=mahfnCpeetDNzFoB2VY4rWM9j3JRly+KOYXnj0Df32z/ii0rpn0NK7gpvnKlxD1nXg IC544LBnuMRlYxKnrjU/YMrKZ99Wv/O+jWD96cppKvMpKBajTdfMwVp4xFvS2iS94XIn +afOThAJv7ARQ9NnMFtvGMV4+8a4fNt6WDMNki+Sr4r4XxrooEaMvFL8Czi0MBGVxuSy hdwO0zLfMknhhsstdoZEgAua+OTrpjMYItuKcopd9t00q/L8pX3kni2PO0KjmO7hJTfQ pQHRFfchYdakYe4fzRNOunVeMoZBzVGh/WB8N5zHuRB95ZqBTG6O/2TyBa3YAWjqeY6/ PhSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubiB5ITKRK+Vl/d8jVElX1VgdyJd9hdp6t3SNIriZzWn+bYa844 1ChNo7J+ckRVQzQauOBKwCXaNdyj6YI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ0LqceaI0mZemXfVJ8iz85skJ1tk+84tvi9LqcpYZcGxX0q9QLqTTSUIV6Dp0yfARu7nFF7g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a014:: with SMTP id q20mr6313687pjp.91.1585865263939; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.95.92.219] ([162.210.129.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l15sm4044304pgk.59.2020.04.02.15.07.41 for <lsr@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: tony.li@tony.li
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Message-Id: <99212C6C-6158-47EB-975C-5658F2E3F22B@tony.li>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 15:07:40 -0700
To: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/3y0ks-4IBjH9qSOavUnTol_TMIg>
Subject: [Lsr] On collaboration for abstraction
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 22:07:46 -0000
Hi, I’d like to comment on the process for moving forward for the abstraction proposals that we are discussing (TTZ, Area proxy, flooding reduction, …). My understanding of the block on collaboration is that we are prohibited from collaborating privately. We MAY have open, public discussions. Thus, I would propose that we have more interim meetings to try to progress this issue. To help ensure that these are truly public, I believe that the WG chairs should coordinate and moderate these meetings. It is legally important that there be no side discussions. At all. Thoughts? Regards, Tony
- [Lsr] On collaboration for abstraction tony.li
- Re: [Lsr] On collaboration for abstraction Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Lsr] On collaboration for abstraction tony.li