Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
"chenhao.m@outlook.com" <chenhao.m@outlook.com> Thu, 18 March 2021 11:48 UTC
Return-Path: <chenhao.m@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740483A28FE for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 04:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q5bzHP3u-bnU for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 04:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092253039.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.253.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AB903A28FB for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 04:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=akW1QH+CujPNGzLOBtDrhM8Qsdx62DqHCtiuQKrmZiLaHpgDAFI5d02ZNtReCBGgeDk7zaYv3ndMe+H+axP3wW83WwfSqpUC+B/SbNIpbU1+cJwK6GCVJKHXVhg0EPpbBtilBoHIYRNf5z6kC04CDTJ0pTo6Lwx1T27/WzL7olbJ0v9tbqIm+Us3GwxebW+Ao4aLag5HkGiVl4h+fsT8uIXwjYAxrpBhrWgMnHh02XLpAESkXXThjjiVr0jeFmDJnm0d7NiPSbHrnomvRPbN2Vy0/0DKkk4xAWne+u26ZU9G7+CekOroTK+lpG+N9gNTfsyYpU7OFT46+DNDT0jG9Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TSDAZVehQq2J9WY6Ioh2vXHfCrdIype/+gj+bsfBOXk=; b=TpuwgmB4lRlZ2twOO+qIrwxYWlSrJu/bJHmFp6hqGJjjqtJ7HpImR7eApTeOJpJuFIMHIjKsvGVAFqoJ62/YOEMFTdveJsLTBbbGLSWp2aKDayrfnkzGWZYJJ0HM2oVoAAn3oJrDi/9RwGgzmOdvmELVeKs8mGzSJUbZ6mLdNsCUZW7irm5BfDUIixJDSM09xFRXVDrhlWGUYAr3pzzwqUBUMT0XU5hAtnUvadhnX9Udt7SYKGapMcxEqNIRU6i88PVgPK+l1RRuNCOmbjr5C+TLrA5Hn0OFtdV9PxYnNQx+rlUkZym/NOUywAPZwHaw4vECr8+GrGOH38foe8Qs3g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TSDAZVehQq2J9WY6Ioh2vXHfCrdIype/+gj+bsfBOXk=; b=a+/B8kQqoKE9gg1rJB/zoRivdAsxo+DWP/6CdXo1+lv0o9b5HpVy2ceMqfwImaUPQ9ozAkQHCRzwIueUzKtptiVoJXVA2ka+Y80suvCOiA9KLfF7tKFDn1/xhsxfwssAmVhYLuVDtcVwA/XdI0AS7lfNusm4zhs4VmwXIAJvWth6wMCTZdLojQYZjGtfLIldSAMFi7HL+lv/k1YsHwC2/3ogkydaadSjZB2os+NLVslqYpz9blChQu2ekmIISf15MeRp2ZpYHXtoXHz4fu5ss5R9Bog5nBwOdjhPgFoMuGcpdQktKVMt8kMTpMxdjLNIc+uuZDIlXyhYHNLEC6gadw==
Received: from HK2APC01FT050.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::4c) by HK2APC01HT138.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::466) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3955.18; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:48:00 +0000
Received: from SYYP282MB1005.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::51) by HK2APC01FT050.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebc::343) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3955.18 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:48:00 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:27822B3B03E177DD0F0AB1B76677ADF200854BA775AEE8719299EF2F69AB745F; UpperCasedChecksum:9237ECF20A921B8B794416820E0B697A9F0400B8A359BD88D1DD1564ECA2736A; SizeAsReceived:8785; Count:46
Received: from SYYP282MB1005.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::f9c1:70f8:9ff8:b13c]) by SYYP282MB1005.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::f9c1:70f8:9ff8:b13c%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3955.018; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:47:59 +0000
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:47:59 +0800
From: "chenhao.m@outlook.com" <chenhao.m@outlook.com>
To: "Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)" <gengxuesong@huawei.com>, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <6413094C-F1D8-4DBF-B365-E943473FDDE4@cisco.com>, <96c4f04ef4a14b9491748d1dd193707e@huawei.com>
X-GUID: BAAF292B-6B99-4249-A2FC-AD5FF1E228DD
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 8, 379[cn]
Message-ID: <SYYP282MB10054B98CD68CD9F07B47058F9699@SYYP282MB1005.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart320345714311_=----"
X-TMN: [XYaq82MsCzaovWI2gQyBJb9hiZv/V7jb]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HK2PR02CA0189.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:201:21::25) To SYYP282MB1005.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10c6:10:b9::11)
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <20210318194734478038116@outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from DESKTOP-KS7TSLH (120.244.232.44) by HK2PR02CA0189.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:201:21::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_1, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.20.3955.18 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:47:57 +0000
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 46
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 6c3c43fa-2f0c-4e4d-1f87-08d8ea03ad2f
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: HK2APC01HT138:
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: AM/gmQ+T5nWyvl7fU41Qvbp+qazj5zr/LNYxdxHL5l/+cAGVXMbnPNrBfb5qS2U24gIyZMiUGY4unyyemrLK5F7SRVwdXHAzk5btKOiNrYktKcWhW+Y9BfFosODmXJPdoXeKoh3RKdH4EL92YNcuw0kiUzKGBuAVgtSZNMAaz8VAJDfhISLjTri161m87oOa7YZOVb+cWSdRTBp93jb/tVNLfeqZXyj81mZuyjBoHnRCWupP+YJnb3D/5JYkobk/zzYD/D1WKNCDxkI8JAUEl9xH46u4d8DSBU2gS54LHP15B1RVjC6bSp5sBaXyv0NcvCJZhnQ59uED1KCiqa6aoG+7rUluV7WtejPAKzZgKS3FqwuOGwgIo8U5mrTDWTxq
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: mw/ACFU8C9Tn/YjKD7G5FWohVVlgn1WpmFvamLro0k84OboueVzWuNn2NBERoWOTwza5n42VTS5FF6HRuP8Gtf7oOvk36ycES4E3fCKc9A4T1oh/BrQIGEID6QuyqQjArS7CTs7WWoslWX28AEdbpg==
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6c3c43fa-2f0c-4e4d-1f87-08d8ea03ad2f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2021 11:47:59.1471 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: HK2APC01FT050.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT138
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/4ApnUwiUy0yNCmOGl9fljd4rp-Q>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:48:22 -0000
Hi Xuesong, Thanks for your support. Regarding your comment about the overlay and underlay network, in this context the overlay refers to the VPN overlays which provide the service connectivity, and the underlay refers to the set of network topology and resources provided using VTNs. We could add some text in next version to make this clear. Best regards, Chenhao 发件人: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) 发送时间: 2021-03-18 16:55 收件人: Acee Lindem (acee); lsr@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Lsr]WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03 Hi WG, I support the adoption of this informational document. The combination of IS-IS MT with TE extensions allows to build VTNs with customized topology and link attributes, and SR SIDs are used to steer traffic using the topologies and resources of each VTN. This mechanism is clear and makes sense. A small editor comment: In section 1 introduction, it is mentioned that “Thus these properties require integration between the underlay and the overlay networks.” This sentence has some abruptness in the text . Does “underlay network” mean network resource and “network overlay” mean network topology? More descriptions here may help in the following version. Best Xuesong From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 7:28 AM To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03 This information draft describes how MT could be used for VTN segmentation. The authors have asked for WG adoption. This begins a three week LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03. I’m giving it three weeks due to the IETF next week. Please register your support or objection on this list prior to the end of the adoption poll on 3/24/2020. Thanks, Acee
- [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Top… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Qin Wu
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Huzhibo
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Davey Song
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Mach Chen
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Lizhenbin
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… peng.shaofu
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… peng.shaofu
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Ran Pang(联通集团中国联通研究院- 本部)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… lichen6@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… chenhao.m@outlook.com
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Takuya Miyasaka
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra