[Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-te-app: Clarification on Application Identifier bits

Mahend Negi <mahend.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 06 June 2018 06:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mahend.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C33130EB2; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 23:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.592
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.592 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT=1.107, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2cJEVc0vHpD; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 23:20:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C86C130EAC; Tue, 5 Jun 2018 23:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f79-v6so4383285oib.7; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 23:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OK8BhdoS3ddKS8GUoI1qWHl5cSxz18TCJTwLpEE+fwI=; b=EDiwdbSRq7UJ/px/FXUg8ASpmNezu/BGlxmFH1+hIYxjJBIlZIOkkou9KY0RdQwbqx hhyGwVoqugg2T9lKGrHtbWarAwBrnKPfdauZirLfm2BgcBGI71TkMvOtNkllpij87yYz RKlE0z3hZgfl9gEC6X7TcKYZ1JRIQ418x9JTVQ9+zX6SUzFbnNE743P0UwaQZ7MU2WBk kMQaje3W1vj/h9oyVvqjwSKBsZeGFSOyLHIZHLaTdsn675xx21A++iSWMPGazFop0RxA XI0DTaLwz0Qi4P95NmVVMO59DCWXF6akKSpp7cDUt/8psB7DRk+PjwxpUSOjMAvsBTOF 6bSA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OK8BhdoS3ddKS8GUoI1qWHl5cSxz18TCJTwLpEE+fwI=; b=j6Y8XLCCKKv4Oiv1Z+jA9XDuMyrbs29PDs4xcnRRbhuCh4jdFZAgRkV6/XsNBrYs1f x7TpNvAMTWaUFJ4Hf0PSb5x3lgE9tOnhENRQwK0KF3l5awvCK/TO3xUtM7cKh7wU53R4 pJHplJ2b3/NKIIpzllAQIoaW7G34vBr92ta9yr8srzF8fhyWcUIBusUs+Z4yN3MT4eBd U6lrE7ZbSttzL5Ewm8VXGm0vMrOG7UtJIc9dGfZnRX4IXOTWfFjSxNnpXB8oD7MSGzMj srxLy23IZQ2HvA4wA6kqltVGqBniwOpBCsZBYlQZPGYUWVQfxgOEsm+oqRcuhzQqyfKP 7aww==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3i6runonDIKbQBXVAGa3xC5DHxB2FQVt7+e+kA4zU1ECh++iWp rVVNLzRIeYriG50YUB+IBhFAs7caW7TzNmGS2irleg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKL/FT9LJL9F7Z/gIIso3oPIq8OnVLEeloZIGnth0ndWhMN/Dk01QRaMlMBBNqy6IqUDHgq/fAJR798ph+VW3Go=
X-Received: by 2002:a54:4e10:: with SMTP id a16-v6mr1015107oiy.25.1528266000254; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 23:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Mahend Negi <mahend.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:49:48 +0530
Message-ID: <CAM5Nu_yF+rPXyNxC=91puqPpDRWum76K0sjpz5o3OYD=_MdCFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-isis-te-app@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000114963056df328ec"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/4L1AVChLIZGiFapVbaoE6mq2Bww>
Subject: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-te-app: Clarification on Application Identifier bits
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 06:20:09 -0000

Dear Authors,
I seek few clarifications on "Application Identifier bits".

As defined in the draft:

R-bit: RSVP-TE
S-bit: Segment Routing Traffic Engineering

F-bit: Loop Free Alternate
X-bit: Flex-Algo


Am I right, when I say:

R-bit: For RSVP-TE on IPv6 and IPv4 networks.

S-bit: For SR MPLS and SRv6-TE applications.


I think a bit to be allocated for SRv6-TE applications?

Not sure about RSVP-TE IPv6 case.

If you please your opinion.


Regards,

Mahendra