[Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 18 September 2019 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B75712081E; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis@ietf.org, Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, uma.chunduri@huawei.com, lsr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.101.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <156881788249.4549.15224617747913235083.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:44:42 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/5nYqbnlmn3IM7EXlp71cpio5i8A>
Subject: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:44:43 -0000

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Section 3.1.  The two “NOTE” statements in this section seem to conflict:
-- NOTE: These timers are NOT applicable to a router which is preparing to do a
planned restart.

-- NOTE: The timer T3 is only used by a restarting router.

(2) Per the definition of the “Remaining Time” field, when is it the “remaining
holding time” vs. “recommended holding time"

(3) Editorial Nits:
-- Multiple places.  s/signalling/signaling/g