Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

LEI LIU <liulei.kddi@gmail.com> Thu, 14 February 2019 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A59128B36; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:38:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HnJeA7G3tWcH; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B22A01289FA; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:38:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id e27so5844616lfj.8; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:38:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=m/L9NgnJPEb5Hv8v9SVI5YNH1qu2RXRRtn4V6QubFqs=; b=F7FXPDHAl37JCRV8IeoWmB+LG02vkqq9g9wXHQA4IXOgok3tEKmlW4q0dXkLkeqRbm yVJLe0iuG0jnPXwr7yyXjr/Q00KFvlb+PygO1ZE+7Lz2cf2UqsnvHTwjx/zzAahFH+XZ uH1E8dtESTd9Z4wjYbpOJEazJUTo6OGV4tYBK/PCEnLJE+wMib1F522Ik9S0cr5tjTtd qjj87X9c4Xx1HOFDM3kQQ5yCsXLd8+GSdSI+/0nIf58U9CVdXxQN8W46bOf4amaQErPV XM4KIYm2x0kVVs3hTD1nmvbhjlOrtdewX1NlqXEDTsG6zY0spnnl/chBpjWayNUoP60q eKHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=m/L9NgnJPEb5Hv8v9SVI5YNH1qu2RXRRtn4V6QubFqs=; b=tPEyAqd/ALyjkkB7nMJ0vAIjiI+Wl/e5w19g1ED2vOmdyHSke288M/CGRDCaNw87JP jQa/H3x0XrphyjLNpX0al0EhXDUoIS8UQCxsFNZTVDaj3Tyq9Oxq6vEyswegTWv6Pid2 TszhS341P/el3zqCmR8s2O5/v0ns3HnNlYdiKQgqmbkWqk75HzlcCykVdOM0IsG7OM++ wUb/242aeQTtO6OerUtQtmdVI3SYvzm/61ICaXawNkTS6bkF0XDpqDoZOG5gazuJf8ne fM2IYjgyxurpO5lSxBlU6X1sJRb/PDG+25pujHjpnHZAr0kaAE75WLXC2IZ3EvmXwmRc 51Hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubD0tHOvlGjiB1Rln5lSmiM/Phqzzrwwe3Ib41nPNc/5m+dWMPz Fyvyc22lUHwzEal5l8OZyEeWNakfPDMGmk++dNywjRJ/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYjtb/d3+4Te07vwljXheYgm27K12ZtJl1g4i0XETRuxn8NzTH/YC+XzQoYvRsdnkdkLPyFXJiy8QRkKHbDEXU=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:6f0a:: with SMTP id k10mr3791872lfc.119.1550187524525; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:38:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <sa6lg2md2ok.fsf@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <sa6lg2md2ok.fsf@chopps.org>
From: LEI LIU <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:38:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEy9f1mpN=MegUSaKy+S_8iG+-eYhnr2_kKvZ9DrJVS5sjX2hQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr-ads@ietf.org" <lsr-ads@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc11b70581e328ec"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/6WAiP7oN21x1eBHhcNligt2TDO4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:38:49 -0000

Hi All,

In favor of adopting both drafts in parallel, and then one draft focuses on
the centralized solution and the other on the distributed solution.

Best regards,
Lei

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 2:47 AM Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:

>
> Hi Folks,
>
> We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02.
>
> The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize
> a way to signal dynamic flooding information. It does not standardize any
> specific algorithm for flooding topology creation.
>
> Authors please respond indicating if you are aware of any IPR related to
> this work.
>
> We also have another draft (draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01) that
> started as a distributed flooding topology algorithm and morphed into that
> plus competing ideas on signaling of flooding topology information. The
> intent after adoption of draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 is two-fold. One,
> the WG can discuss adding any signaling ideas from this work to the adopted
> signaling draft (with proper attribution given as appropriate), and two,
> for the authors of draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01 to publish a new
> document without the signaling portion and instead focus on their flooding
> topology algorithm. This new focused document can be considered in parallel
> along with the other algorithm work that has been proposed.
>
> Flooding topology creation is seen as a hard problem for which we don't
> expect a one-size-fits-all solution. Taking the steps outlined above will
> help us move forward on the solutions.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris & Acee.
> LSR WG Chairs.
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>