IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 20 August 2019 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAAD120940; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:05:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=at8/bzY/; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=fX5ChHNW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ovMyesFVvzFl; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D7E212006E; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3888; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1566313518; x=1567523118; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=JhFCI7zSrMDl3oM6J/l8fMrdCTJQdnNKL5FWfuj+/yc=; b=at8/bzY/DExDqbnjc5t5FsJQv1zDkXkSSanXUgoSDdph3XNgn6urVL/D jBUa4OlTesyrfamaJ4uFJOUH74Ecgjrl6C1KuWwbDmWHaZEfNx9EzTeFi L0yN8eNoWUK82QbXfu2d1NhztTAdEfghHmI0EX5mtqMYIc3d1mZbT9Mei 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:OO2D8h1G33m+qCoysmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxGCt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8TgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVceOBEDTJ//xZCt8F8NHBxdo
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CqAAAOC1xd/51dJa1mGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBZ4FFUANtVSAECyqEH4NHA4p8mkGBQoEQA1QJAQEBDAEBIwoCAQGEPwIXgj4jOBMCBQEBBAEBAQIBBgRthScMhUsCBBIREQwBATcBDwIBCBoCJgICAjAVBQsCBAENBSKDAAGBagMdAQIMoEQCgTiIYXOBMoJ7AQEFgUZBgwIYghQDBoEMKItpGIF/gREnH4JMPoJhAgECAYEqARIBH4MLMoImjEGCJTGcQgkCgh2GaIlcg3UbgjGHMI5lgy+KLIdjkCsCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWchZ1gRCHAVZQGCQYJCDBeDT4UUhT9yAYEoi1yCQwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,408,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="320648677"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 Aug 2019 15:05:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com (xch-rcd-020.cisco.com [173.37.102.30]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7KF5GrE006144 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:05:16 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com (173.37.102.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:05:15 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:05:15 -0500
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:05:15 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=k6xFl4yEO/trw4FuAvbP4rrR9N+RmbAjGudoFddtP+hKzcLCDBNHvGLZIqfRXrej1Y0wxBTJzKrBzeGdNEPnnn9/nUIPbosWZ+5WfxibwpzdAKyYWF2H8ZnxQipq/5Ewl+b3v3Z+ZN6XNNWELDWA0OVOv+ORqq6O9m2tNoI5LBOgX+vTX2R/OVuzBKYqV6B8mbcfWlBTUMvKJfDNf+MI1H0t30amei86uXyCeRknlTnGiIfBV0vyikggyqTTwUDkKBq/ZvSOLiPHZsFvkF9wKv+yJv+rs/dNxs77h1zMNxiMnoj8Jmi0ZGiQso+XUcYNFocoy/oPHV0WZJLTzdPgGg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JhFCI7zSrMDl3oM6J/l8fMrdCTJQdnNKL5FWfuj+/yc=; b=AQyeNFC8MzySy/DuTQlIswEHpFSjVD0INoM76Cw+5N4+74mvB4vlJabHeUQ7X42BBA7Bhbwlz6yif3VvDOeOc4cAXrt6wpbUFwP/vjOx54mDcanuJyN0O9/P7JlMV0F20fojYQWagPmglapD6AHVdU+DGy2IoZ6ekhiMRG+z6EudKxtaSezRQgsuZKOflFIAm1ixonI5Ttggz3n5xcUXO/unN3CebBqQ+Y6x+c9zS14/enmiTpYJ/EKKYuPZ6auGob63cUPPtn1EjhzDpKLZ/DlTdB+jRTVEpK0Nj3CTmV15yro51ceFqGM8eAX1354R0cl3bhXZBYdEjQPOFN9epw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JhFCI7zSrMDl3oM6J/l8fMrdCTJQdnNKL5FWfuj+/yc=; b=fX5ChHNW81liTrbkiYrsATeRGM0skp+4hmirftCuNdP1d3vfZcQtQC4shrwpwhlbHtv/GkSIwTPJueyfdSx1MEIgBPnDqhKLJVm065zTyrSv99Uo34LkWDj8cjHPioyinNg/wVwwDHKx6ZvvX9Hle0S7yQTW8y2B5XQwKaEiaJA=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB3632.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.251.211) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2178.16; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:05:14 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2178.018; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:05:14 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ospf-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-yang@ietf.org>, Stephane Litkowski <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVVqrH90MjpyCLqESRWHEd6D/XwacD4PGA
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:05:14 +0000
Message-ID: <932F3922-B99A-4AC1-AEA7-105688ABBD9C@cisco.com>
References: <156623193076.19944.688705526703341576.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156623193076.19944.688705526703341576.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::de]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 73984d27-8f51-4023-b137-08d7257fcdfa
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3632;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3632:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB363269E22FEE2EC64E9D9A8AC2AB0@MN2PR11MB3632.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 013568035E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(136003)(366004)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(8936002)(186003)(229853002)(81166006)(81156014)(256004)(14444005)(11346002)(36756003)(25786009)(76176011)(7736002)(305945005)(86362001)(66946007)(76116006)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(54906003)(6506007)(966005)(4326008)(316002)(53936002)(110136005)(5660300002)(6512007)(6246003)(6306002)(478600001)(14454004)(46003)(6116002)(6436002)(6486002)(33656002)(224303003)(446003)(102836004)(476003)(66574012)(486006)(2906002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(2616005)(99286004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3632; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: u37C5yZSBS7ZOO7uvLxDsyxDxezzoQWulPYEF9dj7d9BqXDIIYZ57zmBw4kFG3blzTRGyahV3Rcv/OTR5rsKiulFH5Y7Gk6k5J1Ytxh6xtcFGYiYa4Yw28Apsxqf4z+pjv+2yn4Bs0JwjWQ2Rz+XNpKc1lOCDoGKaWCgO+Whr6FobJM0tjx/RlkYVKYLn0cuxvE9pCdrNDIpjvqLZAbp+jLU9EzvuXqQduKL7dHrvXQ5iJgueDfASwiZGE6IStJ8csvoE857JuVqOxBM5fv+QnOrECVdNP0wgKmkGSrbX2qAsdvsh4v8Nb/skTu5dWThtEWojFSTZlSxWgMgkvWYloacYSHdhFq1kTHweYIROdH5c27+Xz4WXRiC2rqg1lq+bmZCdpPwPfebErebH9K8TrQjsD+8AKyxTWo5PuBxEmQ=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8691B6E500B28F43944332CEBCCC1987@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 73984d27-8f51-4023-b137-08d7257fcdfa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Aug 2019 15:05:14.1858 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: P3LigyocfV+bzsT+cSW+moj0HVb9tIFR3PNUMuLulQe/pmKlFMCben9cUFLX9zYC
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3632
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.30, xch-rcd-020.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/6avHw0zSq6RnkAXZM5StEXbOFSY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:05:20 -0000

Hi Mirja, 

On 8/19/19, 12:25 PM, "Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker" <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

    Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Just two quick questions about references:
    
    - Is there no reference for mtu-ignore (see section 2.4)? If not, can you
    further describe what exactly would be disabled?

I added "specified in section 10.6 of [RFC2328]." to the sentence. 

    
    - Also is there no reference for OSPF Non-Stop Routing (NSR) (see section
    2.4)...?

While many vendors have implemented this feature, there is no standard as the goal is to restart without other OSPF routers being impacted. We did add the additional text to describe the feature and differences with OSPF Graceful Restart. 
    
    And one more comment:
    
    In the interface-common-config part (p76 and p77) you provide example or
    default values for various intervals and delays. Where does those values come
    from? Would it be possible to provide a reference/RFC that specifies actual
    default values? Especially when you specify something normatively ("The value
    MUST be greater than 'hello-interval'.") it would be good to provide a
    reference!  Do any specification maybe also specify min and max value? If so,
    you should mention them here as well! If not would it make sense to recommend
    min and max values? If possible I would strongly support to describe min and
    max values as well!

The whole question of defaults generated quite a lot of discussion as there isn't really any one-size-fits all default and the sample values are very conservative. This is how we ended up with sample values in the text rather than YANG defaults. Since the protocol specification doesn’t specify min and max values, we were hesitant to specify them in the YANG model more than 20 years later. Also, many vendors have supported sub-second hellos. This wasn't a good idea and it has been supplanted by BFD. I will add RFC 2328 Appendix C as a reference for the sample values. 

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email