Re: [Lsr] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

[Peter Psenak <[e-mail]>]

Hi Murray,

On 06/05/2020 07:52, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker wrote:
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> As with the IS-IS document, I assume the presence of six authors, above our
> usual limit of five, was approved by your AD.
> 
> I agree with Barry's point that this document and the IS-IS document could
> easily have been combined.  Even some of the syntactical things he corrected
> are present in both documents.
> 
> When would you ever not do what the two SHOULDs in Section 3 say?

advertising ELC property with prefix advertisement is optional. We can 
not mandate it. It would make all routers not advertising this data 
violating this spec.

thanks,
Peter
> 
> 
> 
> 
>