Re: [Lsr] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Wed, 06 May 2020 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9953A0A12; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JINDG31yOqiM; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F36183A0A52; Wed, 6 May 2020 05:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1446; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1588768749; x=1589978349; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HhoKjuFE5G+Av9oJDMpSAQ1kq3irWzc3Uk17aSqUZpg=; b=VGfhEHGJSk5juzhuy+jZv9PrSMEcMsy8USv7yxFG7ngcttbbd23LD00T s9qar8yg9xUeJMya3tYju9S71TwuhvpIe0pPFPLJGDQvgwKLqFStDt2Fc E6GGUs3k0K09dXrs4P6gtOFaKzGKD5qJZuClB9b3VQIACKhcsMCjM0OjM s=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,359,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="25876693"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 May 2020 12:39:01 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.51] (ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com [10.60.140.51]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 046Cd0ST009504; Wed, 6 May 2020 12:39:00 GMT
To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
References: <158874432005.11799.17357260664387833460@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <6bd87198-8776-a80b-72b7-d7f1d66d4e85@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 14:39:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <158874432005.11799.17357260664387833460@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.51, ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/6qXtCN19hxMMw1SXZK7jpWuWBko>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 12:39:19 -0000

Hi Murray,

On 06/05/2020 07:52, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker wrote:
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> As with the IS-IS document, I assume the presence of six authors, above our
> usual limit of five, was approved by your AD.
> 
> I agree with Barry's point that this document and the IS-IS document could
> easily have been combined.  Even some of the syntactical things he corrected
> are present in both documents.
> 
> When would you ever not do what the two SHOULDs in Section 3 say?

advertising ELC property with prefix advertisement is optional. We can 
not mandate it. It would make all routers not advertising this data 
violating this spec.

thanks,
Peter
> 
> 
> 
> 
>