IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3608F12D7F8; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 06:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C_MHCcVA8fxc; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 06:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE7BB129385; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 06:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2198; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531835681; x=1533045281; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OU6rXdOhvsayBciI+USx6WPB79vUvawLyZYNCEY8Ap8=; b=f35jRiRdEBTvQIA8p0z9D55Z9WnDe97Yl1rj6pP1jD6o/65yhFpfAZNe ms4NV7tGz3u71Kip16aOXIY7yxuHEHcAO8ZgG/teXpx+S/KwkZWguoflp zCqwtlmdqyRKHmWZab1vqIUJzq/AqJVRc/iYc1pRwpe0gg8HVI3SUmLKc g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C8AgAH9E1b/4sNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYMbLmN/KAqDc4gEjDyCDIM4kgGBegsYC4RJAheCWSE0GAECAQECAQECbRwMhTYBAQEEAQEbBhE6CwwEAgEIEQQBAQMCJgICAiULFQgIAgQBDQUIgxmBfw+qRoEuikAFgQuHd4FXP4QigxkBAYRhglUCmVwJAo8dgUuMIod9iXACERSBJB04gVJwFTuCaYIlF4hZhT5vjCaBGgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,365,1526342400"; d="scan'208";a="425078714"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jul 2018 13:54:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6HDseDw004920 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:54:40 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:54:39 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:54:39 -0500
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr-ads@ietf.org" <lsr-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
Thread-Index: AQHT8qrG9J6mz5ZwvU69LFjauFcew6Rh3oSAgAUpHQCALLy+sA==
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:54:39 +0000
Message-ID: <4dbe9a99763d4d39a320fcf498303eda@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com>
References: <87y3gatmql.fsf@chopps.org> <45c18832cc9143f9b6fff0c1da4b742c@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <6623B634-A565-454C-AD4E-E2DE28C89B93@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6623B634-A565-454C-AD4E-E2DE28C89B93@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.23.191]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/8aB6QjbCi57wokZ4fQUYQIJVH_U>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 13:54:43 -0000

Hi All,

I was reviewing this draft as the Shepherd. It is a fairly simple and straightforward bis update to RFC7810 to fix an encoding error.

There is one point that I would like the authors and WG to consider. 

The draft in the appendix talks about two interpretations of the erroneous sub-TLVs and from the conversation on the list I get the impression that there are at least two implementations out there which did different interpretations. Do we want to consider putting in a suggestion (i.e. not normative perhaps) that implementations updated to this specifications accept the sub-TLV with the Reserved field included and size 5? So they don't consider such an encoding as error or malformed on reception?

Thanks,
Ketan

-----Original Message-----
From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: 18 June 2018 17:38
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>; Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>; lsr@ietf.org
Cc: lsr-chairs@ietf.org; lsr-ads@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

Hi Les, 
Yes - the Working Group Last call has completed. We'll find a shepherd and request publication.
Thanks,
Acee 

On 6/15/18, 10:49 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:

    WG chairs -
    
    Can we consider WG last call completed? (It has been more than 3 weeks...)
    
    Would really like to get this small but important correction published ASAP

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email