IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Wed, 28 August 2019 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2793120089 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=S7KU6GLa; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=qGpImvYH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tMvJCmCOfzqZ for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 394C912004C for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18614; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1567025949; x=1568235549; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=6AtSK/HdXbJHEf00LWW8zyDNt/W0o8oO59NYHlZjPqg=; b=S7KU6GLaowKmUcmflPIaQ2STu+VTEMD7Syjbj/QVGWY/zZuafnd8JSg/ Oj+0g7iqfkRFZPPpIZmBJeaytJKpYcW3ejuptw9ea+sQJCdb6fUktBFwJ OvzuISFDjYR1s6HcHs7ukXcHCA7NrUskKYxzSerBp+IzoLOURXCln/Lr3 w=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:UGj7yBQiIGLZ5XW7dWq6O1aDuNpsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBNfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOiM7Gt9IWUVq13q6KkNSXs35Yg6arw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AkAQCS6mZd/5RdJa1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBZ4EWLyQsA21WIAQLKoQhg0cDim5Ngg+TDoRcglIDVAkBAQEMAQElCAIBAYQ/AheCOSM4EwIDCAEBBAEBAQIBBgRthS4MhUoBAQEBAxIRChMBATgPAgEIEQMBAQEoAwICAjAUCQgCBAESCBqDAYEdTQMdAQIMoi8CgTiIYXOBMoJ8AQEFhQkYghYDBoE0i3cYgUA/gRFGgkw+gmEBAQIBgWAVCQ0JglUygiaPIoUXiQyOPAkCgh6GbY1+gjKHMYQcilqNbIdvjgqCOAIEAgQFAg4BAQWBZyGBWHAVgyeCQoNyhRSFP3IBgSiOBwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,442,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="616971915"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 28 Aug 2019 20:59:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com (xch-rcd-015.cisco.com [173.37.102.25]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7SKx81i022269 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:59:08 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:59:07 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:59:07 -0500
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:59:07 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=mJFRvhONozCnBjP/G57xQklOuVB8yE/An1Icof0DlYEW3nNdFz4sBMshjrG3oafdvMBOkwqtO4FNE+laO+47nzeCiUP0sp3CzVNM4GDdSyd76j/KYc3c3OPnGgrPFNimQN4z+eWEPjzNJeiwEsvfxnAkdLxHCATLaWidpOyaT+YvGQO2czgEaI8Xu+dmGM904Zm57ULP2XZ8h+eH1IcmSb7dt8K6akYZGghrLLuOtaggLdjYKtSsMN1lnU+6+XmT9xAShxWhCNINgMzf5VN0ZpLY/Vd11ztY6PSZPC88nFudu1iQDQ2i/agbJLHbT7IeDuA0zNhjQakHnkAv2eQ/SQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6AtSK/HdXbJHEf00LWW8zyDNt/W0o8oO59NYHlZjPqg=; b=Q8iqwaDiiE50i80tMuvC2U2Fk5Xeg2XU87ARn0BeD1DWV18Z31CVBV4RgV0YIVklC1Yp0XfZgoSk2309Vh3JnlRTLz1ag7KrNanJBDyTxjuFPvCQXdChFZ12ODBDuU4OUQn9dxHSI68XNuE8L73pvAzGKeI3ZMOJnfqg2BTiK+xrvi7XhlcpVq/j2I33ef0PowqtuSHqjw75jQZ3eeVFNOUODms6FLmIcPhh0z29zZ7aszA7kVwE3HGu4pZhquEWvrlHLJ+vS/scFVyuaPjMAt7oxb07gXjha0B4nHFikayBBg+bgGo8KtRTIKuhDkpyZ7dZJ7wW0Y4HFYxtyIRFeA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6AtSK/HdXbJHEf00LWW8zyDNt/W0o8oO59NYHlZjPqg=; b=qGpImvYHNA9wU0G/uFiA3sdtcNtRdqcey15k8AOTvZ9nYpFCSRhqcuh1qo+1WZ1ACkAvRugThC0hLwFplCtcOrRVieShxfxZK52CFwT4r6cNH6gWxhVz7uqRj9z8oWpwhJZGm+XwFaad53W/56A8wdb4F27xBfpojBpuCS7C+O0=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.237.19) by BYAPR11MB3430.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.225.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2178.18; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:59:06 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d8d2:7e49:1687:aab2]) by BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d8d2:7e49:1687:aab2%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2178.023; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:59:06 +0000
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@futurewei.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
Thread-Index: AQHVXd/ksSeWFROOokmGeVd/cL8YDqcRBXTQ///B0oCAAEPG8A==
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:59:05 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3638B39096DD691416307957C1A30@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BAE7E3E4-F817-43DA-BA7E-34E31A16E562@cisco.com> <BYAPR11MB3638247F602F41AC87FB3E16C1A30@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <4BBEA66D-0B41-43E6-8CDE-1E0428988718@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BBEA66D-0B41-43E6-8CDE-1E0428988718@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ginsberg@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c8:1002::3ea]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2fcc7bf9-b78c-4d5b-0e65-08d72bfa905f
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB3430;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3430:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB34302DF406E0F468ECA1AE13C1A30@BYAPR11MB3430.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 014304E855
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(346002)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(199004)(189003)(53936002)(71200400001)(33656002)(74316002)(110136005)(76116006)(2906002)(66946007)(64756008)(66446008)(7736002)(66556008)(66476007)(6506007)(14454004)(53546011)(186003)(316002)(6116002)(790700001)(8936002)(6246003)(102836004)(8676002)(606006)(81166006)(81156014)(229853002)(476003)(7696005)(256004)(52536014)(55016002)(2501003)(86362001)(76176011)(99286004)(5660300002)(54896002)(6306002)(25786009)(486006)(9686003)(11346002)(236005)(446003)(478600001)(71190400001)(966005)(6436002)(46003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3430; H:BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AuVLqhQGxJ7E5vbpV/TcRfkwxpHOUyHngMAIibK04HQKqR5hTjQXMBD9uL6cvhcFxdjrkjQG/ZqpDpdJ5C498dZ+JhkBFxE8ZDQwcy300HgVJDqri0tqC63cg1HJo41XJmU/t3Ad/dFY/HNdcg//vGX4emFnvmAV6f8jaibC+jzNrsImn05PyOP4pALcRuV/rF4ijUFT7LGY3M7GLJMOnZglp6dp2ZLMKSbgGlTs7K/vsehqdIrSOWwXch0ViUx9PV+3xHSNCYEfQfiv9nlF3ltwK9a1pt6ICMPje/KfarCmrztASVZWZrxmoL7HHBNCCLTLhVoCeIkJL3D7y0DKeNR/3cudxlS2Md38FiGiNi85BgOlmsgfkaXzDvuAFtmLheQSUOpIHwloeLydqOmwDc9IOaVeSDw5dmjJcYQ90eU=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB3638B39096DD691416307957C1A30BYAPR11MB3638namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2fcc7bf9-b78c-4d5b-0e65-08d72bfa905f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Aug 2019 20:59:05.7902 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: SUkUQojKQEg2b6lqhs6o3OI5kihFfn81l4Vk17kNJmus+bvAk6hSCmMtB4Z0pHBH/anMtVHc7fufG1bxvL25zw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3430
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.25, xch-rcd-015.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/9-5eD2jb43uIABSbBjqRc7_mVPY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:59:12 -0000

Point taken…

  Les

From: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 1:56 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>; Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@futurewei.com>; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Les,

Then what you meant in your response was, “generic RLD” as opposed to “generic MSD”.

Thanks,
Acee




From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com<mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 4:46 PM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>, Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@futurewei.com<mailto:uma.chunduri@futurewei.com>>, "lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Subject: RE: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Acee –

I do understand the question – and I believe the reference I cited provides the answer. You need to read the referenced draft.

If you have a cogent argument why it is safe to assume that the combination of actions required to support EL translate to any other type of activity that might be required on a label stack, please make it. Then Uma’s suggestion might make sense.

   Les

From: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 1:34 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com<mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>; Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@futurewei.com<mailto:uma.chunduri@futurewei.com>>; lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Hi Les,
I think the question is whether there can be a single RLD depth MSD rather than a RLD solely for entropy label discovery.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com<mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>
Date: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 4:29 PM
To: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@futurewei.com<mailto:uma.chunduri@futurewei.com>>, "lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Uma –

Please read https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12#section-4

In short, we do not assume that EL Load Balancing can be performed for generic MSD.

Thanx.

   Les


From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 11:38 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Can anybody tell what was the conclusion (if any) in previous discussions in various WGs on why the readable label depth in an LSR has to be entropy label specific ?

IOW can we just modify this as “readable label depth” as opposed to “entropy readable label depth” ?
This would allow any other special purpose label inserted in the stack and would be at par with current MSD type “Base MPLS Imposition MSD” ( https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters/igp-parameters.xhtml ).


--
Uma C.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email