[Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 15 May 2020 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DAC3A00D2; Thu, 14 May 2020 18:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, acee@cisco.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.130.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <158950595036.5639.14249690264747935521@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 18:25:50 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/AGaL3sN1NTbk1Ja-ruCyX1HUsss>
Subject: [Lsr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 01:25:51 -0000

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nit: “ When an OSPF Autonomous System Boundary Router (ASBR) redistributes a  
prefix from another instance of the OSPF or from some other protocol,   it
SHOULD preserve the ELC signaling for the prefix.“

S/the /OSPF/OSPF/.

S/for the prefix/for the prefix (if it exists)/ — some protocols will not have
/ carry the ELC.

Apologies if I missed it, but I didn’t see discussion on *exporting* ELC into
other protocols...