[Lsr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19: (with COMMENT)

[Mirja Kühlewind <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Minor comments:
1) In intro: "...while an adjacency segment, in
   most cases, is a one-hop path."
Is that true, that in _most_ cases it is one hop? I though SR makes most sense
in order to specify routers/hops that need to be visited, not matter how many
hops are in between.

2) The contributor section has the following statement:
"The following people gave a substantial contribution to the content
   of this document and should be considered as co-authors:"
Should this section then not be called "Authors" instead?