Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Fri, 16 August 2019 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28581200D8 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=CVizjTxC; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=l9FS/2MU
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xdm8lTcByRLZ for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECA051200CD for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 11:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10164; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1565978881; x=1567188481; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ulDguq3g8uiSbQNrlYmszC6L22Qef3EMKx2zH5Ux8TQ=; b=CVizjTxCyASM15B//5l4hpVY09L1IXzosFy3DyZkrLYwWs396rbhjA8f 9Pmvv6T+ZB3weNajImDiIBUrIO/h8ExiBt0p4/MylPizUzQwZFwKD/VD6 yVCqz0sIQdo2UjpXp2olgFNWg6SV5vV9gOYgSL5ZDw47o1uYdKhs7laSP Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AV5dI+RHkVjYZwDyylFL0Sp1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4z1Q3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNV?= =?us-ascii?q?cejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+efHraTcwEd5NfFRk5Hq8d0NSHZW2ag=3D=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AGAADG8FZd/5JdJa1lGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUwQBAQEBAQsBgRUvUANtVSAECyqEH4NHA4RShiWCXJM?= =?us-ascii?q?JhFqBLoEkA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYQ/AheDAyM0CQ4CBQEBBAEBAQIBBgRthSc?= =?us-ascii?q?BC4VKAQEBAQMSCwYKEwEBNwEPAgEIEQQBASQEAwICAjAUCQgCBA4FCBqDAYE?= =?us-ascii?q?dTQMdAQKfOQKBOIhhc4EygnoBAQWFBxiCFAmBNAGLaBeBQD+BEEeCHi4+hEY?= =?us-ascii?q?VDxCCVTKCJo8VhQ+IQ45uCQKCHZROmEKNWJgIAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFQOIFYcBW?= =?us-ascii?q?DJ4JCOIM6g0aHDXKBKYxzAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,394,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="615398879"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 16 Aug 2019 18:07:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7GI7nED026485 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:07:49 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:07:48 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:07:47 -0400
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:07:47 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GE9xIqW+fW8kReZCGUOaAIithlgAh2s9fOkK3RVyr1Gv6sXVGK5nE/Xd4u6VUlSsl/0L00G2+oMcaZ3D5piWi5b0UsTGCXZbN4R2TrnF0zXtKFgH+HtW2af0g3/szK/1R2w3QtMlCWzrO3Jd/e8lK7IQx3DjYYUKwHgNiuqknBzxOuZYqeHhOxnfKeihMYtB9cj0Fthxzw5a65hZCgfa6hVzbThXryM8tY16jCUeopUv7oNXGe53Ul9ndYWams67fDwicS0pY+QaNPw7ayno+sqd1tQRL7YFqbDnfquO5abyg8mffbSW8ypDBQ0wpaI9JqH90mlOltMTML3idSO9QQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ulDguq3g8uiSbQNrlYmszC6L22Qef3EMKx2zH5Ux8TQ=; b=QC1B2Vk2E1jMUjbyJ9fF+olUVUHOZ+21EeNHsmvprw1EgfPbmouKVAFkcNmjFHsFXwjtnCFYLHsZ84KUcT1t3+SdwTeWWCw8LloeFFCR8RuSN84z2S3k3S/HE2LWBVNAul4tECYkcQ9gGMDR6Ns79MEInWueSXVRAqkNERuvKLFnzXNAzo/8EWJ8BKpFD9C8lNpVTcs/JJVq34jHR5XeuU6tDYqhL+GPSxKJossNa91ZROm3vqFzhoRzCoGBK+1Ay4tA7XaKZFvfg65DZXYkdr9lbqKGXhII4rXHNNQRbUfyBeZZa4WOGM3ET7/ZQd3Ppn4UsGGMiaqGcKQpnl8biA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ulDguq3g8uiSbQNrlYmszC6L22Qef3EMKx2zH5Ux8TQ=; b=l9FS/2MU15g/Yh13E/Mo2OUrvdZMWPyLr+2A7yOOzk3j9jjq34fPj5dOyYogDTjvgJ00k5t907k/472lnQWsLQ/x0Bd5HJ6Fr0r55U0GQq99StaypjhIHEtme3HYl/vUh46op7n9ucdXQQOyAmRjMcYwEQQswA67rYSdIW4yD4w=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.237.19) by BYAPR11MB3381.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.186.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2157.23; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:07:46 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d8d2:7e49:1687:aab2]) by BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d8d2:7e49:1687:aab2%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2157.022; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:07:46 +0000
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "tony.li@tony.li" <tony.li@tony.li>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01
Thread-Index: AQHVVEyDkulONyKDa0KAalBXHFuS6ab+EHaAgAAA+2A=
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:07:46 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB363826C6814F96998F096F3AC1AF0@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <8BAFFDB4-62B0-4018-966E-6861D89D0BD1@cisco.com> <01a501d55338$945c2b40$bd1481c0$@org.cn> <C90AD13E-1512-4373-9CF7-32BAD6D65EC6@tony.li> <CAOj+MMFNkVbgbN1v7Q_4PBfLVN=Me_whcR36Um-Eu_AgSDF4Xg@mail.gmail.com> <24D935ED-28C3-4A84-B42C-E429EC2D6FE8@tony.li> <00b601d553fe$9636a5a0$c2a3f0e0$@org.cn> <DF25D566-1EC3-483A-BCE9-5C6EDDF74617@tony.li> <4ABA6852-23CB-4B11-9FB2-C4A643740441@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <4ABA6852-23CB-4B11-9FB2-C4A643740441@tony.li>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ginsberg@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c8:1003::46b]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 563eb2a9-ac6b-4c92-c04f-08d72274a479
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB3381;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3381:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB33813DE09687D9DA2014E225C1AF0@BYAPR11MB3381.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 0131D22242
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(136003)(376002)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(2501003)(99286004)(54906003)(33656002)(11346002)(102836004)(53546011)(6506007)(478600001)(7736002)(46003)(74316002)(6116002)(790700001)(4326008)(25786009)(6246003)(476003)(186003)(316002)(6436002)(53936002)(446003)(14454004)(76176011)(6916009)(229853002)(76116006)(66556008)(66946007)(81156014)(2906002)(486006)(81166006)(6306002)(256004)(71190400001)(8676002)(7696005)(71200400001)(86362001)(66476007)(55016002)(64756008)(5660300002)(9686003)(236005)(54896002)(8936002)(52536014)(66446008)(5640700003)(2351001)(14444005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3381; H:BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: wefTnqmkr2/Iv2l5dzMZJ+L51xYPAU+uH84g8dRza4EMNX58sZ4I3kyJt5c0sskGRySMySPWFq5dTrweIFvQv3uZdXlTMrW+xzJQYzXfFYs8RrUIDDOfSDIDEYXFPCwknT/0+pXYh4wT6fgUW80pfrCJc1MzNVKuGxROi4RIAoxEHtgi7+X6iVfEtvvjFXu20b0aQ+hO+8Jv8YsoiJlTLx/WR+gaSYFeYLDE/MQb8Bxdiy71/tWh5/BNl6YAH5r6uWoGmJg0WA9LL+Y2W4jrvubTz3s+c7/wPouuMsNXxGct5MEU1vlgceePxYy8c3jBidfuNdbmtDmKgfH3an8B5sF5qFtMknb99/fpVeBrnLvny56ptpnqlf5tJwYBbP4KGZGkapio42bTyw+rTphq/uQ05MFRDNsszGarLjQ8OgQ=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB363826C6814F96998F096F3AC1AF0BYAPR11MB3638namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 563eb2a9-ac6b-4c92-c04f-08d72274a479
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Aug 2019 18:07:46.6398 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: C8ohgU/lLpw7BJDZBiszdgos3bau6OJZefHD2bA188C7YUoLOvqx5rlR87gBv7SH1wVmdCaRF5RNYUmNvhItrQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3381
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.23, xch-aln-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/ALtM-M34KCPMIf3Npt4wtWpN6q4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:08:04 -0000

To expand on this a bit, the point of the draft extensions is to add additional levels of hierarchy and use existing mechanisms (leaking, summarization) to have traffic flow up/down the hierarchy.
The intent is NOT to bypass the hierarchy.

People can use multiple instances and redistribution to do whatever they may wish. In that context two instances of IS-IS are no different then one instance of two different protocols.
But this is decidedly NOT the intent of the draft.

   Les


From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of tony.li@tony.li
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 11:01 AM
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>cn>; Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR Working Group Adoption Call for "Hierarchical IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-hierarchical-isis-01


Hi Aijun,

Les kindly points out that what I’ve suggested here is completely non-standard and requires multiple IS-IS instances.

Tony




On Aug 16, 2019, at 9:03 AM, tony.li@tony.li<mailto:tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

Hi Aijun,

If, as you stated,  we connect R1 and R7 via one link(although we will not do so, if we design the network hierarchically), how you flood the link information hierarchically but let the traffic between the two connected L1 area bypass the L2 area?


The link between R1 and R7 needs to belong to either the top area or the bottom area.  R1 or R7 needs to participate in two areas and leak routes between the two areas.

Tony