Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Wed, 28 August 2019 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE17120073 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=MgcPd2YN; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=kzLHg1e4
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gtNxiRFlrSyK for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF277120059 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5534; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1567024110; x=1568233710; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=evG7DXEVgYNEDSWsomX5UIrK8y8IkulnNRVJJZud0/Y=; b=MgcPd2YNvxsI1D5wyPsftuwSttjqY0EuI4dJf8B1cvpQYGEiBFME0yVv UrknE7OPvMdPIKOt8JMNTw6mDownMOw5IzewDYMJOkd2ze6KzmjbOae1a muGXWlvTsoxsPkO7/yGBEYMvFxU0ODetfVPFg6fAMJPr1RpF/LX4Z4xca I=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A9h/3qBfIkPJQEAs0PSqzNnQdlGMj4e+mNxMJ6p?= =?us-ascii?q?chl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwGQD57D5adCjOzb++D7VGoM7IzJkUhKcYcEFn?= =?us-ascii?q?pnwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/YC08B85PTlBN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AYAABc42Zd/4gNJK1lGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBVQIBAQEBAQsBgRUvUANtViAECyqHaAOKb02CD5MOhFy?= =?us-ascii?q?BLoEkA1QJAQEBDAEBJQgCAQGEPwKCUCM2Bw4CAwgBAQQBAQECAQYEbYUuDIV?= =?us-ascii?q?KAQEBAQMSGxMBATgPAgEIEQQBAS8yHQgBAQQBEggagwGBHU0DHQECDKIrAoE?= =?us-ascii?q?4iGGCJYJ8AQEFhQkYghYDBoE0AYt2GIFAP4ERRoJMPoJhAQECAYFgK4MQgia?= =?us-ascii?q?UOYkMjjwJAoIehm2NfoIyhzGEHIpajWyHb5BCAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFXCSiBWHA?= =?us-ascii?q?VgyeCQoNyhRSFP3IBgSiOBwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,442,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="620642196"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 28 Aug 2019 20:28:29 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (xch-rcd-010.cisco.com [173.37.102.20]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7SKSTxR016553 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:28:29 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com (173.37.102.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:28:29 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:28:28 -0500
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:28:28 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=EVw/rl0sFo4nhCXPWY0fTjkn5vHJmEveBxEEI5wVzcnd3m1mc1uYieMxsGB3vNuq2F5T2lnvtaO2sIOVZksX2yAXYVMd0wIVv6r8XBLjpV9wVAXgzmrPqGys5zCJyAO+xSZfjodibebO35qUcDu0D5FOPPoMbAaml8nWHiMdErs4Yeixlm0fm38QyAEz73fpa5CYAl+T3pGe5Ex375WwA6HdF3OacaYdVqzGSmsfhDck/6iUX7QgQgN/wyz2c25C4v4RiM/yagIEcwF9/VUSlLOOXpAznFoPlIFm9SD5XLA/MWwDMccWhwcZQvQz2J+41SxQoe0sTy54hqxXxGTCPQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=etBg87KlWurJNoptS0deMKGvFmAB1IAZgr0bzBAcjTE=; b=RjE/QflpyGdjLayjh85akC7sI5ND1ht+89tvE4wS0FxvSbUUwDCXtXKTNxjBI8hOS3UgwpbuCmt31mc9OtQa5YnylKiy7JXHDQ+DUEvvZlk35hFXexp/6FNaYgY8LZKY8PrEA+bY+U9HMkiA2Q+br+3OFPyP4kxfGRxCPWBKsmll6je5N9BnQpoxT/cL0zaB0UNfKTgJpDk08/cdNX1XM5yuk+7yHSdACqlDLBCS5bFZGp/f+jdCnM59BD+r7NLCTON4ND1k0pkazGkylnu4Vyrj2+je9MaR/GfUWkfNBHLKk3UQKFkAAUy5frsF601Bn4nAhDQjHUVObdqp4s+0ow==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=etBg87KlWurJNoptS0deMKGvFmAB1IAZgr0bzBAcjTE=; b=kzLHg1e4Mo35bTROlc5vrdiw0hOW/aaCmt9RkjVG3NMl7bWxDnsXHodRSaIhXZ7GA91SzWatlx+E0CV0L5h1QdFyH6VJqWOXJ7d+DjpQm+sjZhIXKcJy+caG3I2SJm4CxzD8yEz8WIDuGOjqTM3c+yhPd3lMgjPX+FzwP+Fkeeg=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.237.19) by BYAPR11MB3094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.227.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2220.18; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:28:27 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d8d2:7e49:1687:aab2]) by BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d8d2:7e49:1687:aab2%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2178.023; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:28:26 +0000
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@futurewei.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
Thread-Index: AdVdzjaWAHP07ic1Rraz/826XoSTqQAEIw6w
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:28:26 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3638225EEF7E063B475C75F3C1A30@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CH2PR13MB34627356CECA59C9E442D16686A30@CH2PR13MB3462.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR13MB34627356CECA59C9E442D16686A30@CH2PR13MB3462.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ginsberg@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c8:1002::3ea]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c7adf2b2-3e40-4fb5-a269-08d72bf6483a
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB3094;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3094:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB3094BD813587D0066FBBA147C1A30@BYAPR11MB3094.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 014304E855
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(396003)(376002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(189003)(199004)(790700001)(8936002)(5660300002)(74316002)(81156014)(2906002)(6436002)(8676002)(6116002)(7736002)(52536014)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(76116006)(81166006)(14454004)(606006)(966005)(478600001)(4744005)(33656002)(6506007)(316002)(486006)(46003)(110136005)(11346002)(446003)(229853002)(76176011)(99286004)(186003)(53546011)(102836004)(7696005)(86362001)(476003)(256004)(71190400001)(53936002)(9686003)(25786009)(2501003)(71200400001)(6306002)(54896002)(55016002)(236005)(6246003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3094; H:BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: rzsXMWGi9COmS+czdPGMWLqVOUV+1KtBCkTuJEGiq30PWLT09aSEl0INwhKOSaTt0BFytrJZ5KfMkH2iQ8vd26rN/2bQIcNvCsEMyL/9nPgLG16UWrACSVNZbMrDlVCczkISXDJ8DiS5VNy+Sr8ebGq1FqXQHV79AK5UttRa38CElqzadje7WMXkMFwJjlXtmvMU62QDIVJEK8jtEgmYcAj9l0g//nb6hcxSWWb/X+o+IFRCacEOnhOs6PGUkUxUkrj/VFgAi3ep9/Ms7BlRg1CF7VSb/AogKZH+QRzc8sIKRiJ1WyGA8EemW0R/ycp76P4Sns9DyQX7UXM1JwMLyTcY6kOmRQ8tvBf0lyj585EJkW7mSixDOyfJci1ofrcBndHeMiWGuz6IeFUO2b9CsmHb1+XQXmtJEYtgcZnxDXM=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB3638225EEF7E063B475C75F3C1A30BYAPR11MB3638namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c7adf2b2-3e40-4fb5-a269-08d72bf6483a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Aug 2019 20:28:26.8256 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ZDwstq4dkkawShtxKx7lfTPAnE+gpyDEnq6wYufMnLFwNqkZzlX+PuuEB7nh960ufBkw2aM+5zTp3/k6EfvNVw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3094
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.20, xch-rcd-010.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/AP51kuKn6SaX0JJ0kJj8NxENv4g>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:28:33 -0000

Uma -

Please read https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12#section-4

In short, we do not assume that EL Load Balancing can be performed for generic MSD.

Thanx.

   Les


From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 11:38 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-07

Can anybody tell what was the conclusion (if any) in previous discussions in various WGs on why the readable label depth in an LSR has to be entropy label specific ?

IOW can we just modify this as "readable label depth" as opposed to "entropy readable label depth" ?
This would allow any other special purpose label inserted in the stack and would be at par with current MSD type "Base MPLS Imposition MSD" ( https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters/igp-parameters.xhtml ).


--
Uma C.