Re: [Lsr] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-15

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 27 September 2018 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660C4130F20; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ut-ytPBwqhH2; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x229.google.com (mail-oi1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF9C130F1D; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x229.google.com with SMTP id e17-v6so2261231oib.4; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DRjK94+Hl5FFrKikA7NXax+BSR1698gUGm093ZJeKeY=; b=Lh+D31pI5uxrY6CyROTkpRhYSeNGHQmAsfOFKF1Bf2v0xKIMij7kLJWBsqaaHL3a+1 eu/XqgJ0O4fRvIJiz3XXHy6Ox/BYBsxjymGXJWTHzUPSiCGyjvh8JoVV8bHWVSrrWoje 8UQFUfmugOudE0HB5c7nAuIWLEeVXBXqQzEoXJYy/CNML3+ZS49xIsYa0zTdAWDCNUlk jyDS8twH3EtMgec+Ptf6mrvIjdLkPu97lPur8BLQc8uIufACGzihDCwcQcZcaGbKJ6f4 MNxF7XkFc41GQkGFVnxa7ZbrL0w8B6nu3sL3WrPlNvWuH8lY5VMxzSR4/0qft1OSsaDY Beag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DRjK94+Hl5FFrKikA7NXax+BSR1698gUGm093ZJeKeY=; b=MGtNI4YxYjoINEIJoUgFPBzL55666W8eVxrcdQEkFcq+2EtI7Mzu2Pqi/IMKOUfhOh DTyn1OIdLwQWJCwbyPWfKaE4yfpjMVvogsBjPj6h6uKBICwzmcHABR5f/LCzPQGcdarR c2UCXT7POGwWyMWeBeAU4GhBhskDXW/tLowRJtxRGKtpE0RR4MPLhEd4UGWr+fVhjlAa yBKNvCryqLTCLZ7EQa3ILUmeoNwrMMoeA3pnWFNcB1f/3ryAyXwQ3wX8WxFr8EAy2ULy R49h5oJYEPYMa/eBnHmPGCUq7ypyOjpzO1Wu1ZzVNYhWHx5FuKnXVG0SKBATxACG4dos xu/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoipGWkXiQoezR1UTnmWtR6iTSZcSdkIvHhTBPlATTnmywuc+Z9X 61CyFyoe+25iYvtLvppQaYRMHTX8RGRwR63Kke8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62LDCOFehncIebh8li/yepDNI1RjXuHg963mNQ3jyUdozaTOt7GPwXXVWl8+LA9fVOhmQ9WcMOhCrA3fZi2IsE=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4509:: with SMTP id s9-v6mr1518744oia.234.1538075018094; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:03:37 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7a22ba26220d45c8881c5bbf95f4b7e0@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <cb33dfed-f14a-e079-78a7-83659aac7ffb@orange.com> <da219cdbe1db4edab2afb4dc03aa8656@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <2414700a-0cf2-f663-8ab8-c312c4845ebb@orange.com> <f74187a7c96b40ebae4dccdd26bc29f3@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <af362362-3c0c-6e42-562e-c6f7f16d14ff@orange.com> <CAMMESsy1Wn+O6iuuy_PdFxo6s6nSF0ztc__wyxR3u_WJBXe2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <7a22ba26220d45c8881c5bbf95f4b7e0@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail (506)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:03:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxvPenCqnxFLGSwjdLuGM8U7mMrCagjZsXPK0qhMRnhxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org>, "rtg-ads@ietf.org" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001790aa0576deff77"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/AmcGxV_CRiCpxkqj0uYa--ZAom8>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [RTG-DIR] RtgDir Review: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-15
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 19:03:40 -0000

On September 27, 2018 at 2:44:34 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (
ginsberg@cisco.com) wrote:

Les:

Sometimes less is more. ;-)

My personal opinion is that, given the precedent from rfc4221, the
additional considerations are implied.

I’ll approve the publication either way once you and Julien agree.

Thanks!

Alvaro.