Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 04 March 2021 16:54 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8468D3A10AC for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:54:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QEvbXbRf05vd for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:54:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CBEC3A10AA for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:54:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id k9so24436330lfo.12 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 08:54:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NyuC59Hoj+yA8Bjb+EeIabdDTHTU1GEmyTzLqSxVfD0=; b=Rl6L0MNxqQmkz5hbeLiqBVlC7ye5YGMSChTefBj7Z+YHPAefxIEndWxa6XQIG8WEEq KeUXBlqdpUkEVB6tZR/o3Tiw1d+35DoaNDYzV5qE39MQ7txfUSr1DcOC0kQgCO9h1/lu tdPegFNHSEIwXAyX1m+RC1dmKMVxq32j+4CmSQUnSMx/Qg6z/si6q6YwZpnaa56vBnJj 9wvTxJMvT6Dxv+qGnKAz18HaAD9BwxyGKPdcuOpZf48gqpcTFSB7nSplrS9LFzpgaQnP 7QFViwYRnlqDowyFc1G/1rK43f8jeTlUR6UrKMepvrKCFrYobKOCLkw68FlUD/UBOyyr UZlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NyuC59Hoj+yA8Bjb+EeIabdDTHTU1GEmyTzLqSxVfD0=; b=kzEVJmvye3q65sHynSuyizR0gr5F1+un18ui8kSIrT+KQOuEp/go4LoVTrCjk5CIhy Lx4S7HL+Y8yONix2HMCJ9d2z2UeA+L3qW392hy8HAtiB3PFIYN1cQxo4FmXOSCMyOQ32 YCLOSt69Z7G3LwLDYaS4bjeiBCvGcSq9K1e6INsW24wrGEZ4ZjhK2iitf0WENUKsGhFT WI/QsMR7+xZ3xChmmVFhDW54t7F7/+iCFcqzYhjOhabKtPJf58+jab01F5YadZv/t5Ye 3bdPoWpf35D5B0FOm4qXTGVMMGsyCsppMJ3SrrtINNwSPmjXdcsfPY0pb/2nnS+vutoZ LsOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530D7y0fS0PBZzlUgUf7GtkNjC5SDQbp1Rdjp0kYxir9O9805Iv+ BCsQenTqhe1k30jZrWDU5I5bjouZWDYtgdGBg4SvSg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJylpS7/Ar2kutjhTvqH05GYXN+HK6KV5fGAza8ZatMfOklNmfZpzcxFLaWHRqQYfdkbY0vbSpJkRh/hNYIPaq4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46db:: with SMTP id p27mr2755614lfo.396.1614876885557; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 08:54:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161401476623.19237.3808413288895066510@ietfa.amsl.com> <2c2605a8-95c6-a477-b1b5-5ae4d4de222a@cisco.com> <52B3A5ED-6ACC-4772-BEF7-085A33A53F31@tony.li> <e5190522-3a8b-2d6e-c2fe-646049689cc4@cisco.com> <1EABA651-2F05-415B-97EF-054507FADEAC@tony.li> <f935dbc4-6220-5f47-65a4-f642823f594f@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMHXd5j8B9a13E90HQVB=SUOkQ=fqhyJEgTf-Y7Tp5eiBQ@mail.gmail.com> <9d66e5af-414a-42b7-6af5-388974785b8f@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMGggyuzqD=ZbDxNG_10ThHykOO7y5rYWphvSk0rs+4CbQ@mail.gmail.com> <bb9555c4-8007-4d0e-2715-39c4069fc61f@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMFP+Tx13v99GaOc8vQaN6UPkSiS7UX1hRFwevKd8Oj13Q@mail.gmail.com> <532100cf-0252-73f3-046c-218de2fc26db@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMEYAc=LN6JfTto7fwcSzeQuyUdeTTC262c5LwBfPFgRRg@mail.gmail.com> <f21c7460-86ff-6169-1bf8-3e95e843e9df@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMHtFS3X7G622ik3q3uy46M=49dY3gQ60X8pCxNyga9QLw@mail.gmail.com> <528e48f4-3fa9-c9bb-b707-3c451aa05eac@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMFwgMM+hVn-ahdRhEbOhJNN1tyGNCqT1banMYUW6D9Xmg@mail.gmail.com> <fa60b949-4f09-f56f-c7f1-716592274b42@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <fa60b949-4f09-f56f-c7f1-716592274b42@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:54:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEQCM1rSHBr-vM-K=1JxC0gDxq4bepXDPw3o+X2rKDgaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Cc: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>, Rajesh M <mrajesh@juniper.net>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, William Britto A J <bwilliam=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001eb47905bcb8d3df"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/AyB-iVOPhZwNA0AnsIA__BgrC7E>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 16:54:50 -0000
So it is undefined in the spec. All along I was just asking what is your default probing interval. It can be: 0 ms - means never probe. It can be probe every N ms|s|min\hours etc ..means prove every N ms|s|min\h etc ... It can also be probe every time after link down -> up event but not more often then M ms Care to share that with the group ? Thx, R. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 2:30 PM Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> wrote: > On 04/03/2021 14:28, Robert Raszuk wrote: > > > Is it minimum ever, is it min of the year, month, week, day ... > etc > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8570#section-4.2 > > > > Peter > > > > > > Maybe it is just me but in section 4.2 I see NOTHING about how often > > that delay should be measured which was the point above. > > it says it clearly - "over a configurable interval" > > Peter > > > > > Thx, > > R. > > > > > >
- [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Const… William Britto A J
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… William Britto A J
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… William Britto A J
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… William Britto A J
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth C… William Britto A J