Re: [Lsr] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19

"Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net> Mon, 03 December 2018 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD68412426E; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:33:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5098r8TZd44e; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B21B130DF2; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1D86F45194; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:33:06 -0600 (CST)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ugQkeMk-7asp; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:33:04 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [172.16.1.76] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5FC36F4518A; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:33:03 -0600 (CST)
From: "Pete Resnick" <resnick@episteme.net>
To: "Acee Lindem" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions.all@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:33:03 -0600
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.2r5568)
Message-ID: <9A38B12D-EAB4-410B-AEE5-9645C0356E96@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <D3EA99AC-4DDC-4631-854F-3A7930FB7A6D@cisco.com>
References: <154386478357.4938.10701933464978005263@ietfa.amsl.com> <D3EA99AC-4DDC-4631-854F-3A7930FB7A6D@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/BEdHedIDt14-zdOoKvh24nCrXMQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-19
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 22:33:13 -0000

Hi Acee,

On 3 Dec 2018, at 15:46, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:

> Hi Pete,
>
> While both you and I would have done it differently, the variable 
> length SID encoding across the three LSR protocols (OSPFv2, OSPFv3, 
> and IS-IS) has been implemented, deployed, and will not be changed 
> during the IESG review (you'll note these SR protocol drafts have been 
> in development for over 5 years). There is, however, an update to all 
> three which clarifies the usage of the flags. See (for example):
>
>     https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Acee (Document Shepherd and LSR Co-chair)

Totally understood, and that's why I said that I certainly don't want to 
stand in the way of the doc. And I appreciate the clarification in -20; 
it helps. My job as a GenART reviewer is to make sure that the Gen AD is 
aware of any issues. I think it's highly unlikely that she (or anyone on 
the IESG) would balk at this point in history.

Thanks for your (and Peter's) quick replies to these reviews.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick http://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best