IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Dynamic flow control for flooding

tony.li@tony.li Wed, 24 July 2019 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8034B12062D for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.559
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.091, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEluDe1qIDGO for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com (mail-pg1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB5B1205E0 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id l21so21906089pgm.3 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=apMjA6/kjWtAH19UfElS6XNcZ66w1dNlzFBSx3J2scM=; b=BTSbJ6fQ+nvFxm1nO1JcaQFBpF8ewc7UAfaWh48NLgTA+0slTb/fBy6iyPS0XsbvZY lgoBgK1GZZ/Qe0Jh7gRCHGoiDSCy0X8r3wXhQDJGrXSMTlgTRrsPuekEBXSMouLXEQjq 3ZNEVHMMj7hbuRz1U97y6wUrriWKpOazaCosdzRGk3js8x8mZvz0uEf3A17byTRMIweE Buwu4bviein3CoOS/MnllRAZ4dNEwp6MSZCFgNS1FCe8iXMfoqsR5unWZnVEQfz90C7K Zq7PaW33Ssi2SP80btGXhxKL9D7urHYsY8+/tratudAT2H90QORkcvcQm2Af+CTeuTJf uPTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=apMjA6/kjWtAH19UfElS6XNcZ66w1dNlzFBSx3J2scM=; b=TzEhJxkDybH7UkOMhuqeapjVpKnUa4QIeLg2g2vehRF+p9C/LAZz5kDRf8cnU4USuK k7D/e0UsQVmTOMNk0wNk50pHjl3MUsqWC7IeNC0Ea1dRGhJrOq0Va0L3hU32whF/D6kh L4wSRISKT2jkBvB1pctQsWc9NxI53oeKUYT2AFajW5tuR8t10DQao0zvMbEZ1RarwmLW lWTr6UGe/2EkcdwE3EaLTcGg46KQUalxy680NtOQOdmu4G7joFUQzwfKfDwIGJj3KuO9 038Kbe7UW8NoT8sjaEU7WCragSm6Sq2YR51fxcVVEbEEb1vPkMW1h1U4B6G0jhoGn2pz Lrsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV0BJPxNGOmEhQicHcWXY63qyHYyi0q/IfuO4L8HeQzYPFm/W4b 4xsg87G3BiMmsOJFIkx9nKw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqziXdWA+Zh3WmQmDHmv2isEhsCAp7oAt/tDDokn0oPt/EnzDKyO++y8yEeBdKGA8LnT2OSoXA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:d84e:: with SMTP id k14mr83641437pgj.234.1564007241617; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.228.115] ([162.210.130.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p67sm56532189pfg.124.2019.07.24.15.27.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: tony.li@tony.li
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB36388446EBAF9B7DDE2F2765C1C60@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 15:27:20 -0700
Cc: Henk Smit <henk.ietf@xs4all.nl>, "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FF81D928-CAAE-4D9A-B8F7-9D9D8C1958E2@tony.li>
References: <CAMj-N0LdaNBapVNisWs6cbH6RsHiXd-EMg6vRvO_U+UQsYVvXw@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR11MB36382C89363202D1B5659614C1C70@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <5841_1563943794_5D37E372_5841_105_1_9E32478DFA9976438E7A22F69B08FF924D9C373E@OPEXCAUBMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BYAPR11MB363856BB026992DFBB3BB224C1C60@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <8376a87831ffa6f5298c5122907c6e66@xs4all.nl> <BYAPR11MB36388446EBAF9B7DDE2F2765C1C60@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: Les Ginsberg <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/BT1z3s7EcZrWkUz7Wm8DRE7CKu8>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Dynamic flow control for flooding
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:27:27 -0000


> Whether a BCP draft is desired is something I am open to considering.


Process nit: what we’re talking about doing, regardless of how we do it, is overriding 10589.  As that’s a normative reference, overriding that requires that we have a standards track document.

I don’t believe that even a BCP is sufficient. 

Well, that’s my understanding, at least.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email