Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 14 May 2020 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D173A046D; Thu, 14 May 2020 16:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=lFR4iqsn; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=L9ycdHvj
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cqIik6k0nN4W; Thu, 14 May 2020 16:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D2303A045B; Thu, 14 May 2020 16:35:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16939; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1589499312; x=1590708912; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=5O3lnfnRNKLhUny268PESLc9kN30ZZ5+JdbjBkfQ6e4=; b=lFR4iqsnKkQKS8xXo0MRO6tOTzLxdi6METt4H3ZoDtfRdbO/6yz3SHRn 0cGB5hesoWqggX31PNQlwCPtCAAhZ8nrVLpn8xwAU6pHRF+i+j9FYIMWv EQrD/8uEzlSz5zdU5EIUTikL1HLJO73pEM/A5avXp59I9oJ+b6EyiHsqw E=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AFN9szR0D9+il3hcAsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44?= =?us-ascii?q?YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxWGuadmjUTCWsPQ7PcXw+bVsqW1X2sG7N7BtX0Za5VDWl?= =?us-ascii?q?cDjtlehA0vBsOJSCiZZP7nZiA3BoJOAVli+XzoOklOE8G4bFrX8TW+6DcIEU?= =?us-ascii?q?D5Mgx4bu3+Bo/ViZGx0Oa/s53eaglFnnyze7R3eR63tg7W8MIRhNhv?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CvAAAd1b1e/5RdJa1mGgEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEDAQEBARIBAQEBAgIBAQEBggeBJS8kLQdvWC8sCoQbg0YDjUGJeolbhGS?= =?us-ascii?q?CUgNUCwEBAQwBAS0CBAEBhEQCF4F+JDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWDIV?= =?us-ascii?q?xAQEBAQMSER0BATcBDwIBCBEDAQEBKAMCAgIfERQJCAIEAQ0FIoMEAYF+TQM?= =?us-ascii?q?uAadhAoE5iGF2gTKDAQEBBYVMDQuCDgmBOIJjiV8aggCBESccgh8uPoIegkc?= =?us-ascii?q?JFoJeM4ItkVqGIYp2j0tKCoJOk2mEVh2dT5A2jC2RFgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSK?= =?us-ascii?q?BVnAVZQGCPlAYDZBAg3KKHQE4dDcCBgEHAQEDCXyNJwGBDwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,392,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="770733021"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 14 May 2020 23:35:10 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (xch-aln-001.cisco.com [173.36.7.11]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04ENZAdn030877 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 May 2020 23:35:10 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 14 May 2020 18:35:10 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 14 May 2020 18:35:10 -0500
Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 14 May 2020 18:35:10 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=c9JQ0dakoGaHYqEZO/tM3H2ZOE/u/fPHYNk+yElxSdtPNzVaIGt3MdaniyICIC2MUbffiacOhrlSnaGoC2R36zsimHCR6YkNUduVo5sTCt7ByZdEr2zq56a0QSoRL7seXEjLAqCmqnwknHwvHeTcMaiCzMqpHP/Fd1BxLOXYzIqytVGzb4H1+YclimGzZC552Jd5TrF4l+buR/CZF5YVplVqHD6F9Ly/qxi22CrMsXntIFUemQja5SG4MyTOrpwv2LdEcgc2hATwz2ZDk3zGKUrb2uMi8vSXQf0uhzwg5rA23mIiuxZRbJvOts0TJqrSf8eJoNdyA7QV7H85UKGcvg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5O3lnfnRNKLhUny268PESLc9kN30ZZ5+JdbjBkfQ6e4=; b=TcQycAjfrGpOWRLixOdLq7i9TlX5PC4GGsfvB8eWb3P0shzvrfKAe4/I5JqSm8oX/BGejWPjD26ZT1rrjLQxW4hGpT8s2C7sB9MrqjYS9O3WSSvJaul/XxipOwzdEBxURZG9d07kVz2xvLDSs5rJnxj0zb3eJ86l9q6wLciQjIe1AEGoMf/jy8kdW4NniiSDDVRMUkshDmkzR8+2nHsPlZC6YBg8ZQlTWdncHUZHrfTZmj7PLa0nnQQV4teNcLogCUWvJwApAzwu2PEDPCo7CKuUZ8cBRLa54ClD/Z2KvpBz8zwVn979yyZpnkW6F57J1LkKbvN9GV05v2VlKKaoog==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=5O3lnfnRNKLhUny268PESLc9kN30ZZ5+JdbjBkfQ6e4=; b=L9ycdHvjUvy/g1jtcE39DNvWevObtT8W2tbVfMK8sTsZhibsdo5/wqs0MxVildlVxEFyLPFdznL/IeWkj5mr/deXxKCoPkmQ6zM8uTxqjSZBWz/qo0JAK1a7sLGh5kPbz/Pyp7NRLJDoOJcTs2bIT9Pex5Dsp6VRgIVW6BjWpxY=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:89::27) by BYAPR11MB3192.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:7a::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.34; Thu, 14 May 2020 23:35:08 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4950:e26c:503f:768e]) by BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4950:e26c:503f:768e%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2979.033; Thu, 14 May 2020 23:35:08 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>, Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13
Thread-Index: AQHWI7JCgVdvvi5zoE6oOrULerjebKicQfCAgAbsPQD//9k/AIAFAdCAgAAhiAD//9thAA==
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 23:35:08 +0000
Message-ID: <D8D0350E-81E2-4DEA-A10F-038A32894FDC@cisco.com>
References: <158877512992.25308.14489968716385236242@ietfa.amsl.com> <5f206fd3-8918-9c1f-e403-8591c54acf83@cisco.com> <f11f10e9-7a4d-903c-726f-9e79c02410a5@dial.pipex.com> <DC25CF92-555B-4D7F-ABD9-4063416CA6AC@cisco.com> <CAMMESsyL9ODXrOgMRE7RX6B_NfQB9Q--Qu6cE4-siWLMbH1qEg@mail.gmail.com> <MW3PR11MB46190C1652223F6EE5D81F3FC1BC0@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB46190C1652223F6EE5D81F3FC1BC0@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 84721c95-ee7f-4a37-027e-08d7f85f704a
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3192:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB31922B77E9A14242D8A5827DC2BC0@BYAPR11MB3192.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 040359335D
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 1K1ovWuDpDiQIq2nhBL7M2bIJ0/elYdWugmIcARUsS8byWohMrL6xy4WqNnD1dU3wlnqXamSIFxVDNu4bQFmKaq0BmWhQ7LSpPW9wvl3QteHbSYsweoX7/Maky3pKvTHzR/jmDArwc0W6DUHYPBcNPmvEKOsGSeS/a3VOqI33osa7S4I+qO4sYWA8CWbxQnUk33cJ1nsJYHBUOIekv6hlTYGQ+fnHtXeBc0oEZOz53DhC2sTvvxoWvFO1fKQmZQqiEZoSyhkFgOxh6a+wNwwUGPmWIrZGt6OwXd376wTXcb/kBpT6IB9L1n8Q/IJ0wn45JnOs04IqYBEaZgC0UHT7E8UxnqHueoG12CNcZ7d/1AVPN9Q7e/p1/Kv3bc2fjyL9lRNp7cARWLx8H0txWXeftVTA8pu0rJgGtyLIfmOBkSpHmrgDuWQ9qUG+F6u1vFO
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(86362001)(8676002)(316002)(66446008)(54906003)(9326002)(36756003)(71200400001)(6512007)(66476007)(33656002)(66556008)(6486002)(66946007)(2616005)(64756008)(110136005)(8936002)(76116006)(53546011)(4326008)(66574014)(26005)(2906002)(6506007)(5660300002)(186003)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D8D0350E81E24DEAA10F038A32894FDCciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 84721c95-ee7f-4a37-027e-08d7f85f704a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 May 2020 23:35:08.3395 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: RrnOpmcRb5LwGD21k8xJ0nQi3l57aky8inJiJNZbDUY1Dz1hkND6TbVZ1pYKu4dI
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3192
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.11, xch-aln-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/BfY-eAJFWJ20R5f34z0Oi2SgX_E>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 23:35:17 -0000

Hi Les,
Good point – I don’t believe any modifications are necessary.
Thanks,
Acee

From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Date: Thursday, May 14, 2020 at 5:46 PM
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>om>, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>om>, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>om>, Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>om>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>rg>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>rg>, "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Elwyn’s comment was:

<snip>
I was trying to understand
why a router that satisfies the previous condition so that it is
legitimate for it to announce ELC with any IP address prefix might wish
to only announce it with some prefixes and not others.
<end snip>

The answer to that is clearly stated in the draft (emphasis added):

“If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, it SHOULD
   advertise the ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF.”


What is needed is to know whether traffic routed via a particular node can depend upon that node supporting EL.  That info is communicated by advertising ELC for the local host prefixes only.
No need to do so for other prefixes.

HTH

   Les


From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 12:46 PM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>om>; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppsenak@cisco.com>om>; Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>om>; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Hi!

Yes, we cannot specify something that routers unaware of this specification should or shouldn’t do.

I believe that Elwyn’s point is this: *if a router supports this specification* then when would it not advertise the ELC?  IOW, the specification only obviously applies to implementations that support it — in that case I would think that if a router supports ELs on all of its interfaces then it would always advertise the ELC, right?


Thanks!

Alvaro.


On May 11, 2020 at 3:18:34 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) (acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>) wrote:
Note that the optionality of ERLD-MSD advertisements appears on
reflection to be a more serious issue than just an editorial nit.

So what would you suggest? There are existing implementations that support multipath forwarding entropy using MPLS entropy labels but do not signal that capability in OSPF. We can't have a document that retroactively mandates that they signal it. This wouldn't be backward compatible. How can you possibly see this as a serious issue?