[Lsr] Query on OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV
JAZEEL MOHAMMED <jazeel06@gmail.com> Fri, 05 June 2020 10:42 UTC
Return-Path: <jazeel06@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A2D3A1459 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 03:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rqbo1avEDyg9 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 03:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E3DD3A1458 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 03:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id g7so6135079oti.13 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 03:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vYAVZ1bUsyserQmpUGcDj406CALMWWQ4WsBw9MHJ1BA=; b=joXzi66lv/LGq2EZTobNnoVWCXUKq8/zks/m093VeJnFetOEyuOBkW2JduQ43jb7pL fnOw25o7j1oT52s1gj25guqwgmEnHRxN1YS/kIzDpyCKF/zjrq8un0gJbOEWZqbUKqc2 O95TFrM3/Fr2TEWF7YoWcXI0cse7RuY/pSiZHv3bEWzN5u2ReCohBp4oRd3gGyLZVwNW gEI9IvPh2QXQn6N/xmtn94eSmr+Gcp5v/cY3zVchJWX7GRn/GX9aHkzSK5Fw7MFyAtKQ 9ZxJo+vxqkw2NhQ8w7gOo212hKUsJtHlLpuRSomaDkj+SbeyJLcApCMHLjj7gGauk6QB 8rww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=vYAVZ1bUsyserQmpUGcDj406CALMWWQ4WsBw9MHJ1BA=; b=LRS4b6Lc7ZiYADODDT64rPKomA7Ux8igzVshlVX0r1A0L2oYPyY5PHphW1WkmrECLe I0Wp5AlfZIEvW1WEtBC0Ci4hCqYJ0TlwLp7AkeUs+m3G+epbTqEmo/OF36fI2SDVd6Od WajtAFS/m7et8gBhIvT3QBKwcstf+CWLH7sUOJl7JctZGVhT/IpbtMHmbb9sHLCwyAc7 i9MZLRPsaKvu4UJtw2vpHZd548RsftiKOym1LKayeNrdQ4WFwDpuYcgJ7bAPB4omX9D+ 2EgUqxLbO6G2m00lP+71d8QzS9/1JHOHQYLDfacs+JtTQt4Vk2Ac76+LJgiMS343NRd/ +RlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hIfUx2tBAwc2ysW0JPTStIy6DTWplVHubMO5rw2/JollfzQlo bg0+hqo0EhZscWBsMB+JFONfR7Y+YDzGd4z4h84NlMxOiWs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxr8wkJuELoCzVhAifuK0rghGiOSuFdY4vzCFRwRXymcNSOr2rZlwh91QpIRbVWy4zQy0ppF2Npi3bgRLcOx3k=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:67ce:: with SMTP id c14mr5599735otn.337.1591353764466; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 03:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: JAZEEL MOHAMMED <jazeel06@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 16:12:33 +0530
Message-ID: <CAL6GYgG=c4DMVKf-8BNxD40y1=TwNgXwvg=Onw2X+pAA2XTLxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: lsr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d7d37805a753eb41"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/BmPn5Fi3waRYN2_Dra7gFKdm49c>
Subject: [Lsr] Query on OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:40:23 -0000
Hi LSR WG, I am finding it hard to understand the below statement under section "3.1. OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV" in RFC7684. " If this TLV is advertised multiple times in the same OSPFv2 Extended Link Opaque LSA, only the first instance of the TLV is used by receiving OSPFv2 routers. This situation SHOULD be logged as an error." is this statement applicable only for multiple Extended Link TLV with same Link Type and Link Id or any multiple Extended Link TLV in same OSPFv2 Extended Link Opaque LSA? Please advise on the same. Thank you, Jazeel Mohammed
- [Lsr] Query on OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV JAZEEL MOHAMMED
- Re: [Lsr] Query on OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] Query on OSPFv2 Extended Link TLV JAZEEL MOHAMMED