Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-ospf-transport-instance-02

[Christian Hopps <[e-mail]>]

Aijun Wang <[e-mail]> writes:

>    Hi, Christian:
>
>    There are issues that are raised during the adoption call have not been
>    solved or answered.
>
>    What's your criteria for adopting of one document then?

1) The WG is interested and willing to work on a problem starting with the given document to get to a solution.

2) There is rough consensus on (1).

Importantly: There's no requirement that the document be perfect, or complete, or even that every one agrees that it should be adopted.

Thanks,
Chris.

>    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/YszRKp3R22IawO_T--CjXRXuiVM/
>
>    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/kbnwOs_K_d8fYKnae-yn3wcFlZQ/
>    Aijun Wang
>    China Telecom
>
>      On May 21, 2021, at 23:06, Christian Hopps <[e-mail]>
>      wrote:
>
>
>    The work is adopted, authors please resubmit as:
>    draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-transport-instance-00
>    Thanks,
>    Chris.
>    Christian Hopps <[e-mail]> writes:
>
>      This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft:
>
>        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-transport-ins
>      tance/
>
>      Please indicate your support or objection by May 16th, 2021.
>
>      Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware
>      of any IPR that applies to this draft.
>
>      Historical Note: The original OSPF transport instance document was
>      adopted by the OSPF WG back in 2009, it was last updated in 2014,
>      and then revived as an individual submission to LSR in Sep 2020. :)
>
>      Thanks,
>
>      Chris.
>
>      _______________________________________________
>
>      Lsr mailing list
>
>      [e-mail]
>
>      https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    Lsr mailing list
>    [e-mail]
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr