Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 06 December 2018 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660C0130DFD; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 07:48:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0Os3_Y_UXCj; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 07:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x12a.google.com (mail-it1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF73130DFC; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 07:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id o19so2002710itg.5; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 07:48:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D9TUgU629In0ArcB2Se4lUNYJ+6Wd7yrEwADavobRjg=; b=UqDF1kj17tNCBItQ4/Jxyz2CLwmGQDYRkBHgvSJiCOzP/xfxDI6Z+KzhYM8yvHlWy0 50jtT4y8Tj28P493gddg8kt9ZBkOQQAGZsUEP5sK8Ak97QwMBIDhbXGdT5PAh/k7xPpE tCiDoe4kIarRfB/Bg25ImUxAuaP1KJYZgYVDAPXClpZpSdhYl0l99zW8oyot55VkG/zu v4Bxnjs9D4nyGGhGhjkXrgP33EnTIgeuJeT5e9+hMUBzWIsSn0GMZ0KCVE153kR+Fy4+ 0Z3WLw6eukcBs07tcjWOL3MB5X0TKT9sRmy06zfhkj48AIS8i3Hsa57KN0ZEdnOnWo4I qZCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D9TUgU629In0ArcB2Se4lUNYJ+6Wd7yrEwADavobRjg=; b=gqa5bvIpQOHv5w4FOKNEn30BXkCcM2AS5FZjxVs7F22UsmO/NIPV+Rsr4KsTvXQsop yKysplLyIzlk/N+UyveNlA/V8rjeeGbRzXZaeET1MvMPspIPVdMd0NF6aTT5BWhqD7rg AWb+w/+vKbGo8MFJWEzxTEr63tRga58QEdxr8Iwvg5zVhDWJpD8SCSRGuyTyV7BPnTGl j3Xbw2qPeIHteH/NKEReILJAtcwzze8xcFN4NnMHmiDY+5Nz/N2ObtzKj1UnZQVE/Uhj U/pxwc5cV4r8Q305I8RYgBCUuAdTVs02iNb9qNWKsX1H2haLdFNVWfwWi4boTEUpYKZb cl8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYalAngF+JhquhhRLDM39cWL5qZj+D0UMyqUd+gENi+dbe5HETK Dl48xGFHRo7E1yqPhALhUmB/7iuHOiMjQQYXYmKO9ooV
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Ulgfii1Bof7M5xv8ZhYdRRqtfkTk26NgzBQDmSwCfpGGcCyMG61I3X/WSlKsqXIqDsvFdmjqm6FfQnCaBngPY=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:b044:: with SMTP id b4mr19512240itj.164.1544111284418; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 07:48:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B560A25F-8B3F-4279-BB0B-75D847D385C6@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B560A25F-8B3F-4279-BB0B-75D847D385C6@cisco.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 21:17:53 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn7mJzheeKwsf+wHPZj4EtEg6vixw=58S7Nm9SJaJLrMAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/CQ9Wgvto-uMUV6AEIVGaatGEAcQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery" (Corrected)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 15:48:07 -0000

I am unaware of any IPR, apart from the one disclosed [1].

Regards,
Dhruv

BTW the WG adopted I-D [2] is already posted, but I wanted to make
sure that my response is archived on the list.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3351/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 1:32 AM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Authors,
>
>
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support?
>
>
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
>
>
> There are currently no IPR disclosures against draft-wu-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support.
>
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.
>
>
>
> If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee