IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-02

Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD643A0A55 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvvnQcspQOzu for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42d.google.com (mail-pf1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F1E63A0A7B for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id r11so12601015pfl.11 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=dkae0Pg8k1htWcxY/XNySpJjzqHeGqK5U3baOOXR/tw=; b=lmE4l/wyX3e26+pKL2GSFuNhBng+o6cQYV9l0p7kYvc4bB1Lqq9y20z6Dizr2jlzyp lk3Ie9bdXhW4r7hZrI+4p1U5MiOElCFgLrPe0xt4FIcRW/+LMYKW/+KLboZMmVTO396p VeinzaxUQR4J1dy0ZE5867j99Kc4A0Qvp0vXju5Fn06szLdREKXeI2ngTAS6CP+m3CFw IxCqfk5R3Zathi5bSooNz1fNHOS9Au/t2sXGFRwMZKosz+UHwlCMcVQpV++E1UlDJoSG rYHKNdHGPIMvDApDLwNUEuKRM/kWbNjui0xQ7fXg8zXbOwOSpgOhxmKYX2jXgl0F3ip5 f5SQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=dkae0Pg8k1htWcxY/XNySpJjzqHeGqK5U3baOOXR/tw=; b=uVawOPWh0je4C8+TrZygs1EvL+Pb56kdmwBpMXl6VOnw39fniwfWduAXEMWUAitKSO L5WIru44ALLPB117bcq+juVCcUS0SSXfLrViw/WnifX4j8firSKsGxy5hiH1dT+z+8Py uF4BdSAYA/6ig2m7UjNv940ka+WhwYJuRRdjcOYTtI/BLdssKOFIlGlZ+2k02YgSi1LM j2Bt6R9QeTzDHbhZJI6xloVr01GeJ/o6ss6pN8r0PwVvxd6W3DTayt5o5lRbCUmWosFQ zj5UJuuRyshv5Feex9rfytcKxrB3+1w853BHAYC1pX8YAARmT3Wg3I/Y7s6BFdbZcEHt hUyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ICCmjxs/8JLG8/EJYc2MDmF6KLFoG6iCpoyRPwa59LE/KsewM ASqt96RUM/m2evFrmbGBJ9s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqGMFZFYFjpELPOTU5uyCSSUgx2itkEjamnUCsR5XrM+ZsJIzddoCAIL3P5kmtKLM0UXmWfQ==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9f10:: with SMTP id g16mr10331873pfr.148.1596554747695; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.95.80.202] ([162.210.129.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm21754133pgp.47.2020.08.04.08.25.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <95A83DB0-A58C-4BD5-AF0B-8EF49D20EB3A@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_35F2A14A-7DBF-4F7A-B3E9-2181027138DC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 08:25:45 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4558_1596554251_5F297C0B_4558_298_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48F0C59B@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Cc: Les Ginsberg <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
To: Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
References: <32323_1596545126_5F295866_32323_118_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48F0BB30@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BY5PR11MB43375CB413060250B336BE64C14A0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <4558_1596554251_5F297C0B_4558_298_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48F0C59B@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/DQVDY-uFKO4gQyZ-DOSs2x80_iU>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-02
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:25:53 -0000

Hi Bruno,


> 
> [Bruno] Agreed so far.
> Do we agree that draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy uses the SID/Label sub-TLV? We both agree that this sub-TLV has no mention of the global flag nor the routing algoto be used.


So far, we do NOT have agreement on that.  Your argument yesterday (backed by Robert) is pretty compelling: go ahead and assign a prefix and now the Area SID may be advertised as a Node SID in the Proxy LSP. If we take that direction, this discussion is moot.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email