Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with COMMENT)

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 01 October 2019 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2501E12006F; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=OjyaT0Oa; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=vWYJn+EH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3tu081mBStrM; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB6D912001E; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 14:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4144; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1569964377; x=1571173977; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=OBkOkU0AwX1rLIU3xjp+zKaG7W/hIH32k/hDhYheJgA=; b=OjyaT0Oa9osibRLS40diWHXnuzglzn6YnbngC8hz5aL2ezDbbrAVhD8J IiPkWDMewM2EBuVGJ+SQ9G4GKkrP4iiUbtcDJNZAIHTNp80KbFF/vdwAs 5lIHD7QWAps4A2OqtEVg8yBa9252YBxyQHHzctJhRGdQsWJQyB93NM4fw o=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:LgKW0h+XBLLK1v9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+8ZB7E/fs4iljPUM2b8P9Ch+fM+4HYEW0bqdfk0jgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVcObGEvwL/PCZC0hF8MEX1hgrDm2
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C0AAAHwJNd/49dJa1mGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEMAgEBAQGBZ4FLJCwDbVYgBAsqhCKDRwOKX4I3JYlnjhCBQoEQA1QJAQEBDAEBIwoCAQGEQAIXghgjOBMCAwkBAQQBAQECAQUEbYUtDIVLAQEBAQMSEREMAQEpDgELBAIBCBEEAQEDAiYCAgIfERUFAwgCBAENBRkJgwABgWoDHQECDKUrAoE4iGF1gTKCfQEBBYFIQYJ8DQuCFwMGgQwoinCBHhiBQD+BEAEnDBOCTD6CGkcCAQIBgSoBEgEfFw+CZzKCJo0Cgi43jliOKUEKgiKHBooGBIQBG4I4h06PM4NAimOIHIILjwICBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkiZ1gRCHAVZQGCQVAQFIFPOIM7hRSFP3QBgSiODYJFAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,572,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="336314780"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 01 Oct 2019 21:12:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x91LCtrJ025574 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Oct 2019 21:12:55 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:12:54 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:12:54 -0500
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 16:12:54 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=evg46K/V4EkVfSe1tGkbRp/VL6p8dS5ANamiOryMdDBHc9DbnuhMpq/byyGRzNDdxgCLu0AbniaIqzC3VZXKps2nmJ8EhJTT3AWeExOysE74d3sUlSbZteRllPQ1uQLbYWaBQ3h6Pm7QU7WpaV/MrhfwnzW2JDuvcsaNvwjxvJAMXtuIvApplHMcsBcgOtLJIgNI3uXiEaZmHfxEjO9oE2hYXYpJiSuB/iN15/jnU0uX1m3mQQwMyRluBdKxtuoLCho2mWh3jsZmMjJDgF5IKVH/zqQPBv5hCDGpw4BCFlOixcsOJnScdPCWeQW4W+vY6SY0mwUnUo3LbwBqOEK87A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OBkOkU0AwX1rLIU3xjp+zKaG7W/hIH32k/hDhYheJgA=; b=gsLIWOaD5vwjUxVylisDwv/TIgbhF8cH31s80uS/udOKLJ4xnXKY9q15cARwbDB2P38qjmevsKCFMDEFSDT3wqzaFSkhF8fJf3qqT+LNUs8D2jIAZtQJdm+Ay30jStijQnMDAFcc6jKSHUWi7qwO2cIFrh9VytkIA7q7QSYcevufYwmaBfgEM8TqkHXsqwc5JwNzS0vYZhv1jEbk9nkxQsW9pzXys0qdrhMDZCeIAqE7zA9Ox0Ordq81ttGxAgLKwys+Ykyb67SK7LTySvaUDPIDB21YppUp3IsEwFE2nB99FQUateR5JQE+qzoRWvgQyjIN33gfziWKDQWIbOlq/g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=OBkOkU0AwX1rLIU3xjp+zKaG7W/hIH32k/hDhYheJgA=; b=vWYJn+EHl3jIK7J4husYRzb//hoBGIoX0SRWHd8iLdOQhH7LSMJliY9UMLp1CUBClWQ50CyW3Scs+1rAslSdyj/IM8H83tRFKMINeu8e1RXPvhhYEl8Lb0JHIFIPvU4xA7bkW//P/l3byWxG/8u6mCpKVCOHFiYrGN32PyW+gDo=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.210) by MN2PR11MB3760.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.254.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.15; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 21:12:53 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e4f8:d335:c018:c62a]) by MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e4f8:d335:c018:c62a%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.022; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 21:12:53 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com" <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org>, 'Yingzhen Qu' <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQFUfRvvRWv9lhwvYMVHjMkp43WChKhIIW9wgAA/2AA=
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 21:12:53 +0000
Message-ID: <BA359A2E-147C-4067-AB23-631A0C7031D6@cisco.com>
References: <156990897840.24021.18079756804564800159.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <001d01d5788e$b8bde700$2a39b500$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <001d01d5788e$b8bde700$2a39b500$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1d.0.190908
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=evyncke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:a102:1062:9772:4dbb]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6f4dd496-e4b8-4f8c-71af-08d746b41fa1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3760:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB37606FF16547C6202D7D61F8A99D0@MN2PR11MB3760.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0177904E6B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(136003)(13464003)(199004)(189003)(6436002)(66556008)(81166006)(486006)(478600001)(81156014)(76176011)(446003)(6512007)(256004)(8936002)(99286004)(76116006)(91956017)(66476007)(476003)(305945005)(2616005)(4326008)(64756008)(5660300002)(11346002)(316002)(6306002)(25786009)(66946007)(966005)(14454004)(71200400001)(46003)(6486002)(224303003)(2906002)(102836004)(71190400001)(229853002)(53546011)(7736002)(2501003)(6116002)(186003)(110136005)(66446008)(6506007)(36756003)(86362001)(33656002)(58126008)(54906003)(6246003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3760; H:MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: SH3mK3vaYgaKFNVaW1fIypziatvTzUPs15X/TdZDh36r9SmvU1xJUcA7aMcFiEIQiDy7Z/WWvJVYWqaoSyW0W7nQvIUIfZhclvsxcgkaPENHHpkStVleXDjcHLshE430KeLRgKDVR1QcYOWisOtBfRArvg4jkkuN6w6koN6pSZLIYIcWAK41VABhROwQmvGXPFuaLJ0dmg3CGcvNbfsLCo6OzGaNdugTSOEwTvw2Kj8sLN/wW4CTO4OEQ/xtEcoQj8F82SZH8GK0xJHlwn25HSED4tgcDoUp+jXU0/GayuRzoi5ZczhGSHjHs3xcoN6x+5TwFmzKO0NtHQOcfYS38h3wQqYP5f+K+LVMQxLdfpphc36ZgnS1iK1jlzXzwTAnNcAwtLTdUq+tRJmlUSLqPPEhT0sSKZk3dDQ47PuYbgvHRq61ymb96d1xKVdAcxRVLYEYlAfC49I6m2blOzVueg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <00EDC526B3CA2B4182D39AC3CEB8573E@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6f4dd496-e4b8-4f8c-71af-08d746b41fa1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Oct 2019 21:12:53.3177 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: LwO/Q9UE5ET1j9mmQZr8NaYq9BTnXCDExMGj8EL8kXLcykvMenuqULYUNt4DScn4RHoWL4mCCh4RAWzFHNZY/Q==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3760
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.16, xch-rcd-006.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/F0e6DwZdpXC2hnJMBg-IT_hR9mw>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 21:12:59 -0000

Stéphane,

Thank you for your reply. I appreciate it.

-éric

On 01/10/2019, 21:31, "slitkows.ietf@gmail.com" <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi Eric,
    
    Thanks for your feedback. Please find some comments inline.
    
    Stephane
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
    Sent: lundi 30 septembre 2019 22:50
    To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
    Cc: draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>; aretana.ietf@gmail.com; lsr-chairs@ietf.org; yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com; lsr@ietf.org
    Subject: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: (with COMMENT)
    
    Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-40: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Thank you for the work put into this document.  Disclaimer: I am neither an IS-IS export nor a YANG doctor ;-)
    
    I have 2 COMMENTs below.
    
    Regards,
    
    -éric
    
    == COMMENTS ==
    
    -- Section 2.3 --
    C.1) Is there a reason to have one example with a generic value of 250 that will never be used as you are either level-1 or level-2 ? (I am not an IS-IS expert of course)
    
    [SLI] I agree that a better example may have been to not have a value for level-2. We can fix this.
    
    
    -- Section 6 / YANG module --
    
    C.2) About lsp-entry/remaining-lifetime, is there also a state about the received hold time ? It could be interesting to know whether the remaining lifetime is 3% of the original lifetime or 30% ;-) But again, I am not an IS-IS expert
    
    [SLI] I don't see the use case here. The fact is that there is no real original life time. The lifetime received from the neighbor is already a reduced value from the maximum-lifetime and depending on the neighbor the LSP has been learned from during the flooding this received lifetime may be slightly different. If we want to really track "lifetime issues", we may need to track the neighbor we learned from as well, but we don't keep track of all incarnation of an LSP from all neighbors, we just keep one (the more recent one). If needed such information may probably find a better home within an lsp-log kind of structure rather than in the LSDB.