Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions

I would like to proposed the following text to make section 6 more clear.

Thanks,
Chris

====================

 (existing text)

6.  Advertising Anycast Property

   Both prefixes and SRv6 Locators may be configured as anycast and as

   such the same value can be advertised by multiple routers.  It is

   useful for other routers to know that the advertisement is for an

   anycast identifier.

   A new flag in "Bit Values for Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV"

   registry [RFC7794] is defined to advertise the anycast property:

       Bit #: 4 (Suggested - to be assigned by IANA)

       Name: Anycast Flag (A-flag)

       When the prefix/SRv6 locator is configured as anycast, the A-flag

       SHOULD be set. Otherwise, this flag MUST be clear.

   The A-flag MUST be preserved when leaked between levels.

   The A-flag and the N-flag MUST NOT both be set.

==== start insert new text =======

   Certain use cases require prefixes/locators that uniquely belong to a
node.

   Since prefixes/locators which are not /128 should not have the N bit set,

   this node local uniqueness is decided based on A bit for non-/128
prefixes.

   When a prefix/locator is categorized as anycast, it does not uniquely
belong

   to a node and cannot be used for such use cases.  The rules below
specify

   how to determine whether or not a prefix/locator should be treated as
anycast

   in various situations.

   [RFC7794] contains the following restriction on the interpretation
of the N-flag.

   "If the flag is set and the prefix length is NOT a host prefix

    (/32 for IPV4, /128 for IPv6), then the flag MUST be ignored."

   The current document does NOT modify this restriction on the
interpretation of

   the N-flag imposed by [RFC7794].

   For a prefix/SRv6 Locator advertisement with a /128 prefix/locator,

   if both N-flag and A-flag are set, the receiving router MUST treat the

   prefix advertisement as anycast.

   For a prefix/SRv6 Locator advertisement with a /128 prefix/locator,

   if the N-flag and A-flag are NOT set, the receiving routers

   MUST treat the prefix advertisement as anycast.  This rule ensures the

   correct interpretation of a prefix advertisement originated by

   a router that is not SRv6 capable and originates a legacy

   Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV based on [RFC7794] alone.

   For a prefix/SRv6 Locator advertisement with a prefix/locator that

   is NOT /128, the N-flag must be ignored, so the setting of the

   A-flag determines the anycast treatment of the prefix advertisement.

   The Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV can be carried in the SRv6 Locator TLV

   as well as the Prefix Reachability TLVs.  When a router originates

   both the Prefix Reachability TLV and the SRv6 Locator TLV for a given

   prefix, and the router is originating the Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV

   in one of the TLVs, the router SHOULD advertise identical versions of the

   Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV in both TLVs.

   If a router receives one Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV in the

   Prefix Reachability TLV and another in the SRv6 Locator TLV, the
router should

   use the prefix attribute flags received in the Prefix Reachability TLV.

   If a router receives a Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV in the

   Prefix Reachability TLV but not in the SRv6 Locator TLV, the router should

   use the prefix attribute flags received in the Prefix Reachability TLV.

   If a router receives a Prefix Attribute Flags Sub-TLV in the

   SRv6 Locator TLV but not in the Prefix Reachability TLV,

   the router should use the prefix attribute flags received in the
SRv6 Locator TLV.

==== end insert new text =========

   The same prefix/SRv6 Locator can be advertised by multiple routers.

   If at least one of them sets the A-Flag in its advertisement, the

   prefix/SRv6 Locator SHOULD be considered as anycast.

===================

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 6:15 PM Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:

> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending after Feb 4, 2020, for
> draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions
>
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/
>
> Authors please indicate if you aware of any other IPR beyond what is
> posted:
>
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3796/
>
> Thanks,
> Chris & Acee.
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>