Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>]

Hi Les!

-07 addresses all of my concerns.  The quick update is appreciated.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 8:49 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>; The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; Uma Chunduri
> <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-
> 06: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Roman -
> 
> Thanx for the review.
> I have uploaded V7 of the draft to address your comments.
> 
> Responses inline.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 7:45 AM
> > To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: [e-mail]; Uma Chunduri
> > <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Subject: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06:
> > (with COMMENT)
> >
> > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > this introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (1) Section 3.1.  The two “NOTE” statements in this section seem to conflict:
> > -- NOTE: These timers are NOT applicable to a router which is
> > preparing to do a planned restart.
> >
> > -- NOTE: The timer T3 is only used by a restarting router.
> 
> [Les:] I have added text indicating that T1/T2 can be used both by a restarting
> router and starting router (details were already provided in the respective
> sections later in the document) but that T3 is only used by a restarting router.
> The second NOTE has been deleted.
> 
> >
> > (2) Per the definition of the “Remaining Time” field, when is it the
> > “remaining holding time” vs. “recommended holding time"
> 
> [Les:] I have removed the term "recommended" which is not otherwise used
> in the document.

Both of these are work for me.  Thank you.

> >
> > (3) Editorial Nits:
> > -- Multiple places.  s/signalling/signaling/g
> 
> [Les:] It depends whether you are British or not. 😊
> As the original lead author of RFC 5306 was British I have conformed to the
> British spelling.
> If you think that is not right, I suggest we let the RFC Editor decide.

No problem.  (*Embarrassed*) I forgot that there was an alternate spelling.

Roman