Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Thu, 19 September 2019 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D13120090; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hL4UH8_O5_Rz; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39458120020; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 07:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x8JEEee2004149; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:14:40 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu x8JEEee2004149
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1568902481; bh=bNuomrekgfMrGWamLQ/Qy6CmKI0E57vfvyMJYDNPlA4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=s+7AwzdAx374D+7Yn/6LMJbEzYHV44MR9mE0ugoGBRjGIzzcbNyBYtt1WPVmQvCxU +1Zu7p9g5UKKeIIJnG2hNZJfUEbImWB12JtIsgrP8BBhtPxltmreH6APRg3IdIxhN4 cAP0zP2V8BvitgC64aMuJ5+sLMu5gtDWw/pitUsk=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x8JEEVXL021059; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:14:31 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 10:14:31 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis@ietf.org>, Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "uma.chunduri@huawei.com" <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVbi+ryARfZN0U0ESB/PFDfOL3A6cybsaAgACcFGA=
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:14:30 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01B345F9E1@marathon>
References: <156881788249.4549.15224617747913235083.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BYAPR11MB3638BECF93242B3D7596D1D3C1890@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB3638BECF93242B3D7596D1D3C1890@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/GQ2PfqL35LeoculCyZM2rmberlY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:14:57 -0000

Hi Les!

-07 addresses all of my concerns.  The quick update is appreciated.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 8:49 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>;; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
> Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis@ietf.org; Uma Chunduri
> <umac.ietf@gmail.com>;; aretana.ietf@gmail.com; lsr-chairs@ietf.org;
> uma.chunduri@huawei.com; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-
> 06: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Roman -
> 
> Thanx for the review.
> I have uploaded V7 of the draft to address your comments.
> 
> Responses inline.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>;
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 7:45 AM
> > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
> > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis@ietf.org; Uma Chunduri
> > <umac.ietf@gmail.com>;; aretana.ietf@gmail.com; lsr-chairs@ietf.org;
> > uma.chunduri@huawei.com; lsr@ietf.org
> > Subject: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06:
> > (with COMMENT)
> >
> > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-06: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > this introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (1) Section 3.1.  The two “NOTE” statements in this section seem to conflict:
> > -- NOTE: These timers are NOT applicable to a router which is
> > preparing to do a planned restart.
> >
> > -- NOTE: The timer T3 is only used by a restarting router.
> 
> [Les:] I have added text indicating that T1/T2 can be used both by a restarting
> router and starting router (details were already provided in the respective
> sections later in the document) but that T3 is only used by a restarting router.
> The second NOTE has been deleted.
> 
> >
> > (2) Per the definition of the “Remaining Time” field, when is it the
> > “remaining holding time” vs. “recommended holding time"
> 
> [Les:] I have removed the term "recommended" which is not otherwise used
> in the document.

Both of these are work for me.  Thank you.

> >
> > (3) Editorial Nits:
> > -- Multiple places.  s/signalling/signaling/g
> 
> [Les:] It depends whether you are British or not. 😊
> As the original lead author of RFC 5306 was British I have conformed to the
> British spelling.
> If you think that is not right, I suggest we let the RFC Editor decide.

No problem.  (*Embarrassed*) I forgot that there was an alternate spelling.

Roman