Re: [Lsr] Murray Kucherawy's Abstain on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)

[Peter Psenak <[e-mail]>]

Hi Murray,

thanks for your comments, please see inline (##PP):

On 20/05/2021 10:38, Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker wrote:
> Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: Abstain
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I'm balloting ABSTAIN for the reasons cited by Warren (and, hence, Ben).
> 
> Some other unrelated comments:
> 
> I suggest asking IANA to review your IANA Considerations section sooner rather
> than later to be sure they know what you're after.  I found this section
> somewhat hard to follow.

##PP
this has been done already.


> 
> I concur with John, who suggested that this document doesn't actually update
> RFC 7370.  I'm aware of the conversation that happened afterwards; just going
> on the record here.

##PP
sure, as I said earlier, I'm fine both ways, so I let others to find an 
agreement.

> 
> Section 9:
> 
> * "It's usage is outside of the scope of this document." -- s/It's/Its/

##PP
yes, this has been fixed already.


thanks,
Peter


> 
> 
> 
> 
>